6 messages in com.googlegroups.sqlalchemy[sqlalchemy] Re: Declaring a relation...
FromSent OnAttachments
Barry Hart24 Oct 2007 13:16 
Michael Bayer24 Oct 2007 13:41 
Barry Hart24 Oct 2007 14:01 
Michael Bayer24 Oct 2007 14:42 
Michael Bayer24 Oct 2007 16:26 
Barry Hart24 Oct 2007 18:58 
Subject:[sqlalchemy] Re: Declaring a relationship twice - could SqlAlchemy auto-detect problems like this?
From:Michael Bayer (mike@zzzcomputing.com)
Date:10/24/2007 04:26:16 PM
List:com.googlegroups.sqlalchemy

On Oct 24, 2007, at 5:02 PM, Barry Hart wrote:

Here's what I had in mind. This set of mappings compiles without errors in 0.3.11:

from sqlalchemy import *

OK, thanks very much for pointing this one out, as it came across a big heap of egregious cruft in the backref code which I graciously flattened (it even included the phrase "if not x is not None"...so embarrassing...). It also raised a few surprises as there were a very small number of unit tests that were actually defining conflicting properties in this manner...so when people upgrade to 0.4.1 some people might get a few surprises (that alone makes it more controversial of a candidate for the 0.3 series, which is in "maintenance" mode). changeset is rev 3660.