| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Armand Turpel | Feb 14, 2012 12:41 am | |
| Stephen Thorpe | Feb 14, 2012 1:01 pm | |
| Armand Turpel | Feb 15, 2012 12:59 am | |
| Roderic Page | Feb 15, 2012 1:50 am | |
| Paul Kirk | Feb 15, 2012 1:55 am | |
| greg whitbread | Feb 15, 2012 5:05 am | |
| Chris Thompson | Feb 15, 2012 8:03 am | |
| David Patterson | Feb 15, 2012 8:07 am | |
| Roderic Page | Feb 15, 2012 9:12 am | |
| Doug Yanega | Feb 15, 2012 10:40 am | |
| Paul Kirk | Feb 15, 2012 10:51 am | |
| Roderic Page | Feb 15, 2012 11:23 am | |
| Armand Turpel | Feb 15, 2012 11:39 am | |
| Stephen Thorpe | Feb 15, 2012 12:47 pm | |
| Jim Croft | Feb 15, 2012 1:06 pm | |
| Curtis Clark | Feb 15, 2012 5:49 pm | |
| Tony...@csiro.au | Feb 15, 2012 7:19 pm | |
| Roderic Page | Feb 15, 2012 10:18 pm | |
| Jim Croft | Feb 15, 2012 10:29 pm | |
| Armand Turpel | Feb 16, 2012 5:12 am | |
| Roderic Page | Feb 16, 2012 8:24 am | |
| Doug Yanega | Feb 16, 2012 9:45 am | |
| Chuck Miller | Feb 16, 2012 11:57 am | |
| Bradley Boyle | Feb 16, 2012 2:45 pm | |
| Richard Zander | Feb 16, 2012 3:10 pm | |
| Stephen Thorpe | Feb 16, 2012 3:24 pm | |
| Frederick W. Schueler | Feb 16, 2012 3:31 pm | |
| Chuck Miller | Feb 16, 2012 4:14 pm | |
| Stephen Thorpe | Feb 16, 2012 4:28 pm | |
| Chris Thompson | Feb 16, 2012 7:05 pm | |
| Kim van der Linde | Feb 16, 2012 7:13 pm | |
| Neal Evenhuis | Feb 16, 2012 7:27 pm | |
| Kim van der Linde | Feb 16, 2012 7:38 pm | |
| Stephen Thorpe | Feb 16, 2012 7:40 pm | |
| muscapaul | Feb 17, 2012 12:16 am | |
| Dr Brian Taylor | Feb 17, 2012 12:23 am | |
| Armand Turpel | Feb 17, 2012 1:25 am | |
| Chris Thompson | Feb 17, 2012 7:03 am | |
| Chris Thompson | Feb 17, 2012 11:23 am | |
| Stephen Thorpe | Feb 17, 2012 1:09 pm | |
| Chris Thompson | Feb 17, 2012 2:04 pm | |
| Tony...@csiro.au | Feb 17, 2012 2:32 pm | |
| Richard Pyle | Feb 17, 2012 2:51 pm | |
| Stephen Thorpe | Feb 17, 2012 3:16 pm | |
| Stephen Thorpe | Feb 17, 2012 3:18 pm | |
| Richard Pyle | Feb 17, 2012 3:22 pm | |
| Stephen Thorpe | Feb 17, 2012 3:37 pm | |
| Richard Pyle | Feb 17, 2012 5:06 pm | |
| Tony...@csiro.au | Feb 17, 2012 5:18 pm | |
| Stephen Thorpe | Feb 17, 2012 5:27 pm | |
| Curtis Clark | Feb 17, 2012 7:39 pm | |
| Stephen Thorpe | Feb 17, 2012 8:04 pm | |
| Richard Zander | Feb 18, 2012 9:26 am | |
| Richard Zander | Feb 18, 2012 9:59 am | |
| Richard Pyle | Feb 18, 2012 11:33 am | |
| Curtis Clark | Feb 18, 2012 6:45 pm | |
| Richard Pyle | Feb 18, 2012 8:59 pm | |
| Paul van Rijckevorsel | Feb 19, 2012 12:36 am | |
| Roderic Page | Feb 19, 2012 5:48 am | |
| Paul van Rijckevorsel | Feb 19, 2012 7:36 am | |
| Roderic Page | Feb 19, 2012 8:09 am | |
| 69 later messages | ||
| Subject: | Re: [Taxacom] validation of taxon names | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Paul Kirk (p.k...@cabi.org) | |
| Date: | Feb 15, 2012 10:51:20 am | |
| List: | edu.ku.nhm.mailman.taxacom | |
registration of new names (new taxa, new combinations, new names) of fungi (and
organisms treated as fungi) becomes mandatory 1/1/2013 ... :-)
registration of typifications (lecto-, neo-, epi-) will be voluntary for the
next 5 years ... :-(
Paul
________________________________________
From: taxa...@mailman.nhm.ku.edu [taxa...@mailman.nhm.ku.edu] on
behalf of Doug Yanega [dyan...@ucr.edu]
Sent: 15 February 2012 18:40
To: TAXA...@MAILMAN.NHM.KU.EDU
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] validation of taxon names
I would observe that, for zoological names, of the following list:
1. Is this a name? 2. Is this the correct way to write it? 3. Is this name currently in use? 4. What other names are related to this name (e.g., synonyms, lexical variants)? 5. Where was this name published? Can I see that publication?
at least 1 and 5 are questions for which an objective and definitive answer (via application of the ICZN for #1) can be arrived at, and that the answer will not change. Thus, these are things which could be made part of a permanent public archive (hopefully, something like ZooBank).
#2 and 3 are things that can, in essence, be objectively determined under the Code, but are subject to the nuance of "prevailing usage" - that is, a sudden change in how taxonomists treat a name can shift the answer from "no" to "yes" (in both cases) or from "yes" to "no" (for #2). One hope that I have is that a mechanism for Registration can be implemented in the future which will prevent such fluctuation, and thus make the answers to 2 and 3 immutable, as well.
#4 is something that cannot be objectively determined, because synonymy is almost invariably subjective.
Realistically, then, this list represents a mixed bag of the immediately attainable, the potentially attainable, and the unattainable. It might be more productive to focus on the former categories, in terms of a community-wide goal. I'll further note that if taxonomists want a system of Registration that will result in permanently stable names, then they are probably going to have to insist upon it, *and* be willing to participate in the process (because such a process is likely to require public review). I'm not 100% sure whether botanical names would work exactly the same way, but I expect that the situation would be pretty much the same.
Peace,
--
Doug Yanega Dept. of Entomology Entomology Research Museum Univ. of California, Riverside, CA 92521-0314 skype: dyanega phone: (951) 827-4315 (standard disclaimer: opinions are mine, not UCR's) http://cache.ucr.edu/~heraty/yanega.html "There are some enterprises in which a careful disorderliness is the true method" - Herman Melville, Moby Dick, Chap. 82
_______________________________________________
Taxacom Mailing List Taxa...@mailman.nhm.ku.edu http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of these
methods:
(1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org
(2) a Google search specified as: site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom
your search terms here
************************************************************************
The information contained in this e-mail and any files transmitted with it is
confidential and is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient. If you are
not the intended recipient please note that any distribution, copying or use of
this communication or the information in it is prohibited.
Whilst CAB International trading as CABI takes steps to prevent the transmission
of viruses via e-mail, we cannot guarantee that any e-mail or attachment is free
from computer viruses and you are strongly advised to undertake your own
anti-virus precautions.
If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by e-mail at
ca...@cabi.org or by telephone on +44 (0)1491 829199 and then delete the e-mail
and any copies of it.
CABI is an International Organization recognised by the UK Government under
Statutory Instrument 1982 No. 1071.
**************************************************************************
_______________________________________________
Taxacom Mailing List Taxa...@mailman.nhm.ku.edu http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of these
methods:
(1) by visiting http://taxacom.markmail.org
(2) a Google search specified as: site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom
your search terms here





