atom feed45 messages in org.apache.shale.devRe: Source Repository Organization an...
FromSent OnAttachments
Craig McClanahanJul 16, 2006 10:04 pm 
Gary VanMatreJul 17, 2006 7:23 pm 
Wendy SmoakJul 17, 2006 8:11 pm 
Craig McClanahanJul 17, 2006 9:19 pm 
James MitchellJul 18, 2006 6:22 am 
Greg ReddinJul 18, 2006 11:02 am 
Sean SchofieldJul 18, 2006 2:20 pm 
Sean SchofieldJul 18, 2006 2:52 pm 
Craig McClanahanJul 18, 2006 4:46 pm 
Craig McClanahanJul 18, 2006 4:53 pm 
Sean SchofieldJul 18, 2006 5:30 pm 
Wendy SmoakJul 18, 2006 5:39 pm 
Gary VanMatreJul 19, 2006 7:09 am 
Sean SchofieldJul 19, 2006 8:03 am 
James MitchellJul 19, 2006 9:25 am 
Sean SchofieldJul 19, 2006 10:36 am 
Gary VanMatreJul 19, 2006 10:58 am 
James MitchellJul 19, 2006 11:13 am 
Craig McClanahanJul 19, 2006 1:42 pm 
Sean SchofieldJul 19, 2006 1:54 pm 
Craig McClanahanJul 19, 2006 2:15 pm 
Greg ReddinJul 19, 2006 2:34 pm 
Sean SchofieldJul 19, 2006 3:41 pm 
Wendy SmoakJul 19, 2006 9:37 pm 
Greg ReddinJul 20, 2006 9:44 am 
Wendy SmoakJul 20, 2006 12:48 pm 
Greg ReddinJul 20, 2006 1:23 pm 
Wendy SmoakJul 20, 2006 2:02 pm 
Greg ReddinJul 20, 2006 4:32 pm 
Wendy SmoakJul 20, 2006 10:49 pm 
James MitchellJul 23, 2006 11:01 am 
Greg ReddinJul 23, 2006 2:36 pm 
Craig McClanahanJul 23, 2006 5:02 pm 
James MitchellJul 25, 2006 7:07 am 
Craig McClanahanJul 25, 2006 9:24 am 
James MitchellJul 27, 2006 9:41 pm 
Craig McClanahanJul 28, 2006 8:20 pm 
Sean SchofieldJul 29, 2006 6:17 am 
Wendy SmoakJul 29, 2006 6:59 am 
Sean SchofieldJul 29, 2006 9:48 am 
Craig McClanahanJul 29, 2006 10:18 am 
Craig McClanahanJul 29, 2006 10:23 am 
Sean SchofieldJul 29, 2006 5:30 pm 
Craig McClanahanJul 29, 2006 9:32 pm 
Greg ReddinJul 30, 2006 4:46 pm 
Subject:Re: Source Repository Organization and Release Strategy Thoughts
From:Craig McClanahan (crai@apache.org)
Date:Jul 18, 2006 4:46:31 pm
List:org.apache.shale.dev

On 7/18/06, Sean Schofield <sean@gmail.com> wrote:

Possibly... shale/framework/trunk/ shale/maven/trunk/ shale/sandbox/

The 'framework' directory could be called something else... I'd just as soon have shale/shale/trunk, but Ted says it will confuse viewvc.

+1 for these three separate projects. We defnitely could use a sandbox for our works in progress.

What about shale/core/trunk instead of framework?

That would introduce a potential conflict at the next lower level ... "core" is also a referent to the main framework library.

Sandbox doesn't need trunk/branches/tags, you can just copy

sandbox/projectA to sandbox/projectB if you want to try something else.

Good point. Sandbox is never released so it doesn't need to be tagged. I'm thinking we would want nightly builds of the sandbox but the version would always be 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT.

Sandbox stuff would go in the Shale JIRA instance I assume? I don't think we want its own instance.

Agreed.

Wendy

Craig