atom feed24 messages in at.iem.pd-listRe: [PD] Live Apectrum Analyzer
FromSent OnAttachments
Thomas MayerJan 31, 2007 11:36 am 
Chris McCormickJan 31, 2007 3:46 pm 
carmenJan 31, 2007 8:47 pm 
Jamie BullockFeb 1, 2007 1:20 am 
Thomas MayerFeb 1, 2007 11:40 am 
patrickFeb 1, 2007 11:54 am 
carmenFeb 1, 2007 12:01 pm 
carmenFeb 1, 2007 12:08 pm 
Michael GarrettFeb 1, 2007 4:07 pm 
Thomas MayerFeb 1, 2007 5:39 pm 
PatcoFeb 1, 2007 10:55 pm 
David PowersFeb 1, 2007 11:20 pm 
padawan12Feb 2, 2007 3:50 am 
Yves DegoyonFeb 2, 2007 5:38 am 
SteffenFeb 2, 2007 6:06 am 
Kyle KlipowiczFeb 2, 2007 7:42 am 
PatcoFeb 2, 2007 8:08 am 
carmenFeb 2, 2007 10:55 am 
Thomas MayerFeb 2, 2007 11:38 am 
David PowersFeb 2, 2007 12:09 pm 
PatcoFeb 2, 2007 12:48 pm 
robbert van hulzenFeb 5, 2007 10:42 am 
Erich BergerFeb 7, 2007 5:27 am 
padawan12Feb 8, 2007 2:22 am 
Subject:Re: [PD] Live Apectrum Analyzer
From:carmen (_@whats-your.name)
Date:Feb 2, 2007 10:55:10 am
List:at.iem.pd-list

On Fri Feb 02, 2007 at 09:43:09AM -0600, Kyle Klipowicz wrote:

Good point. The idea of 'hearing an image' is great in theory, but will end up sounding like a clone of Aphex Twin's equation track.

nope.

unless you use metasynth. afaik theres still no options in there for image
resynthesis algorithm,

it always uses the same window size, and always generates a sine-wave in the
center of each bin. so everything made with it has that metasynth sound..

there's nothing stopping you from filling the bins with band-limited noise, or
doing funky things with formants a la Tapestrea..