atom feed52 messages in uk.org.greenend.chiark.ukcryptoRe: Demon & DeCSS
FromSent OnAttachments
Donald RamsbottomSep 20, 2000 11:55 pm 
Richard ClaytonSep 21, 2000 6:40 am 
Richard WattsSep 21, 2000 8:16 am 
Neil DunbarSep 21, 2000 9:28 am 
Owen BlackerSep 21, 2000 10:46 am 
Donald RamsbottomSep 21, 2000 11:10 am 
John YoungSep 21, 2000 11:29 am 
John YoungSep 21, 2000 11:41 am 
Richard ClaytonSep 21, 2000 1:25 pm 
Richard ClaytonSep 21, 2000 1:30 pm 
Dave BirdSep 21, 2000 2:12 pm 
Donald RamsbottomSep 22, 2000 12:52 am 
Paul LeylandSep 22, 2000 1:30 am 
Owen BlackerSep 22, 2000 2:09 am 
Roland PerrySep 22, 2000 2:20 am 
Roland PerrySep 22, 2000 2:25 am 
Jon RibbensSep 22, 2000 3:45 am 
David HoweSep 22, 2000 3:56 am 
Charles LindseySep 22, 2000 4:05 am 
David HoweSep 22, 2000 4:20 am 
Owen BlackerSep 22, 2000 4:55 am 
David SwarbrickSep 22, 2000 5:12 am 
Donald RamsbottomSep 22, 2000 5:24 am 
Donald RamsbottomSep 22, 2000 8:32 am 
Dave BirdSep 22, 2000 11:22 am 
Donald RamsbottomSep 23, 2000 7:35 am 
Owen BlackerSep 23, 2000 8:24 am 
Dave HoweSep 23, 2000 3:25 pm 
Dave BirdSep 23, 2000 4:26 pm 
Dave HoweSep 23, 2000 4:38 pm 
David SwarbrickSep 24, 2000 6:00 am 
David SwarbrickSep 24, 2000 6:00 am 
Paul CrowleySep 24, 2000 11:07 am 
Richard WattsSep 25, 2000 3:53 am 
Charles LindseySep 25, 2000 7:09 am 
David SwarbrickSep 25, 2000 10:40 am 
David SwarbrickSep 25, 2000 1:13 pm 
Philip RowlandsSep 25, 2000 2:04 pm 
Dave BirdSep 25, 2000 7:35 pm 
David SwarbrickSep 25, 2000 11:04 pm 
Charles LindseySep 26, 2000 1:59 am 
Pete ChownSep 26, 2000 2:38 am 
Richard WattsSep 26, 2000 9:40 am 
Richard WattsSep 26, 2000 9:45 am 
Dave BirdSep 26, 2000 11:42 am 
Dave BirdSep 26, 2000 12:26 pm 
David SwarbrickSep 27, 2000 3:01 am 
David SwarbrickSep 27, 2000 3:01 am 
Jon RibbensSep 27, 2000 3:46 am 
Dave BirdSep 27, 2000 7:52 am 
Dave BirdSep 27, 2000 11:53 am 
Benjamin GeerSep 27, 2000 6:41 pm 
Subject:Re: Demon & DeCSS
From:Dave Howe (DHo@Hawkswing.demon.co.uk)
Date:Sep 23, 2000 4:38:58 pm
List:uk.org.greenend.chiark.ukcrypto

Dave Bird <da@xemu.demon.co.uk> wrote:

STEP ONE. Get back to the issuer of the threat and say "just to be clear, can you show us why you have a case in English law and that you are in a position to sue, and the name of your UK solicitors."

STEP TWO: **IF** they are for real, ask the user to respond promptly with any reason why the complaint is not valid. Well, they can respond as slowly as they like, but say the material will be taken down in seven days if no reply by then.

it's the IF that is in question - We know they got no response to the Step 1 query at all, but yet they went on to step 2 regardless (and I suspect it would go a little further than taking down material).