55 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-usersRe: [courier-users] rfc2047/2045 viol...
FromSent OnAttachments
Sergey MikhaylovJan 16, 2001 1:28 am 
Martin KokešJan 16, 2001 1:52 am 
Sergey MikhaylovJan 16, 2001 2:39 am 
Alexei Batyr'Jan 16, 2001 4:12 am 
Sam VarshavchikJan 16, 2001 4:58 am 
John Edward MillerJan 16, 2001 10:59 am 
Patrick PriceJan 16, 2001 1:00 pm 
Patrick PriceJan 16, 2001 1:20 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 16, 2001 2:36 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 16, 2001 2:45 pm 
Patrick PriceJan 16, 2001 2:52 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 16, 2001 3:32 pm 
Chad Leigh, Shire.Net LLCJan 16, 2001 3:35 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 16, 2001 4:32 pm 
Patrick PriceJan 16, 2001 4:43 pm 
Daniel BiddleJan 16, 2001 5:05 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 16, 2001 5:23 pm 
Patrick PriceJan 16, 2001 8:33 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 16, 2001 8:59 pm 
Patrick PriceJan 16, 2001 9:42 pm 
Chris MeadorsJan 16, 2001 9:51 pm 
Patrick PriceJan 16, 2001 10:51 pm 
Daniel BiddleJan 16, 2001 11:49 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 17, 2001 4:54 am 
Steve UnderwoodJan 17, 2001 7:39 am 
Patrick PriceJan 17, 2001 9:50 am 
Chris MeadorsJan 17, 2001 10:21 am 
Patrick PriceJan 17, 2001 10:57 am 
Patrick PriceJan 17, 2001 11:34 am 
Tomas FasthJan 17, 2001 1:51 pm 
Chad Leigh, Shire.Net LLCJan 17, 2001 2:09 pm 
Brian CandlerJan 17, 2001 2:40 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 17, 2001 2:43 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 17, 2001 2:44 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 17, 2001 2:44 pm 
Chad Leigh, Shire.Net LLCJan 17, 2001 2:52 pm 
Patrick PriceJan 17, 2001 3:07 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 17, 2001 3:17 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 17, 2001 3:29 pm 
Patrick PriceJan 17, 2001 3:36 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 17, 2001 4:25 pm 
Chad Leigh, Shire.Net LLCJan 17, 2001 6:54 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 17, 2001 7:25 pm 
Peter PeltonenJan 18, 2001 2:06 am 
Brian CandlerJan 18, 2001 2:32 am 
Anand BuddhdevJan 18, 2001 4:43 am 
Sam VarshavchikJan 18, 2001 4:59 am 
Chris MeadorsJan 18, 2001 5:23 am 
Marc HaberJan 19, 2001 1:48 am 
Chad Leigh, Shire.Net LLCJan 21, 2001 12:29 pm 
John MillerJan 21, 2001 4:10 pm 
Tabor J. WellsJan 21, 2001 4:11 pm 
Chad Leigh, Shire.Net LLCJan 21, 2001 5:41 pm 
Larry MooreJan 21, 2001 7:33 pm 
Tomas FasthJan 22, 2001 5:54 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: [courier-users] rfc2047/2045 violationsActions...
From:Steve Underwood (ste@coppice.org)
Date:Jan 17, 2001 7:39:59 am
List:net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users

John Edward Miller wrote:

You can only comment out lines from 539 to 556 in submit2.c, because author doesn't accept any complaints regarding his RFC policy. It's also useful to change default value for is8bit variable from 0 to 1 in line 521.

Y'know, it's fascinating.

I agree in principle with his rationale for this, the problem is that we do not have control over what produces the mail that hits the server.

In particular, going through three days' worth of server log data (since I cut my own mail account over to the Courier server) I find that no messages sent from individual mailers are being bounced, but I'm seeing many bounces from messages sent from mailing lists.

Including, interestingly, some from this list that apparently didn't get through.

As I can't control what content users submit to Majordomo and Mailman lists I subscribe to, I think I'll probably be looking at submit2.c.

As has been commented before, this hard policy is futile. It simply discourages people from using Courier. A more aggressive and purposeful approach would be to follow RFC guidelines - be conservative in what you send, and tolerant in what you accept. Massage and accept crap wherever possible, and send a big fat clearly worded mail back to the originator, telling them their e-mail client is a piece of garbage no sane individual should be using. Then they might start to realise they are using garbage. Right now they just think Courier doesn't work properly. High minded rejection of mail just annoys the recipient, who is powerless to remedy the situation. Has Sam ever suggested what he finds unacceptable about such a scheme? I know I am not the first to suggest it here.

Regards, Steve