On Sep 6, 2007, at 3:32 PM, John F. Madden, MD, PhD wrote:
Looking at the ODF Metadata OWL ontology, a couple of quick questions:
(1) Should odf:MetadataFile, odf:StylesFile and odf:ContentFile be
explicity stated to be rdfs:subclassOf common:File ?
(2) Should we specify a domain and range on common:hasPart ?
Yes. What would you propose they be? [am too busy to think about