atom feed216 messages in org.apache.wicket.usersRe: Free wicket from component hierar...
FromSent OnAttachments
135 earlier messages
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 8:55 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 8:56 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 8:57 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 8:58 am 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 8:58 am 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 8:59 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 8:59 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 9:03 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 9:05 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 9:11 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 9:13 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 9:16 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 9:22 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 9:25 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 9:29 am 
SebastianNov 9, 2010 9:29 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 9:33 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 9:33 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 9:38 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 9:38 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 9:41 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 9:42 am 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 9:45 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 9:51 am 
Johan CompagnerNov 9, 2010 10:00 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 10:04 am 
Johan CompagnerNov 9, 2010 10:25 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 10:29 am 
Johan CompagnerNov 9, 2010 10:36 am 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 10:52 am 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 10:53 am 
Martin MakundiNov 9, 2010 10:54 am 
Johan CompagnerNov 9, 2010 10:59 am 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 11:02 am 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 11:08 am 
Johan CompagnerNov 9, 2010 11:10 am 
Michael BrinkmanNov 9, 2010 11:27 am 
Sven MeierNov 9, 2010 12:03 pm 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 12:15 pm 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 12:17 pm 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 12:22 pm 
Sven MeierNov 9, 2010 12:42 pm 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 12:45 pm 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 12:57 pm 
James CarmanNov 9, 2010 12:58 pm 
Igor VaynbergNov 9, 2010 1:04 pm 
Carl-Eric MenzelNov 10, 2010 12:48 am 
Carl-Eric MenzelNov 10, 2010 1:04 am 
Carl-Eric MenzelNov 10, 2010 1:23 am 
James CarmanNov 10, 2010 4:31 am 
Carl-Eric MenzelNov 10, 2010 5:08 am 
Frank SilbermannNov 10, 2010 6:18 am 
James CarmanNov 10, 2010 6:23 am 
Igor VaynbergNov 10, 2010 8:17 am 
Igor VaynbergNov 10, 2010 8:22 am 
Igor VaynbergNov 10, 2010 8:23 am 
Giannis KoutsoubosJan 14, 2011 8:44 am 
Giannis KoutsoubosJan 18, 2011 1:03 am 
Martin GrigorovJan 18, 2011 1:22 am 
Martin MakundiJan 18, 2011 1:24 am 
Martin GrigorovJan 18, 2011 1:42 am 
Martin MakundiJan 18, 2011 1:45 am 
Martijn DashorstJan 18, 2011 1:51 am 
Martijn DashorstJan 18, 2011 1:54 am 
Jeremy ThomersonJan 18, 2011 12:47 pm 
Martin MakundiJan 19, 2011 1:55 am 
Giannis KoutsoubosJan 20, 2011 7:41 am 
Jeremy ThomersonJan 20, 2011 9:16 am 
Martin MakundiJan 20, 2011 9:24 am 
Jeremy ThomersonJan 20, 2011 9:37 am 
Jim PinkhamJan 20, 2011 9:50 am 
Jeremy ThomersonJan 20, 2011 9:59 am 
Martin GrigorovJan 20, 2011 11:40 am 
Martin GrigorovJan 20, 2011 11:47 am 
Martin MakundiJan 20, 2011 12:13 pm 
Martin GrigorovJan 20, 2011 12:25 pm 
Martin MakundiJan 20, 2011 12:33 pm 
James CarmanJan 20, 2011 1:42 pm 
Igor VaynbergJan 20, 2011 2:11 pm 
James CarmanJan 20, 2011 2:17 pm 
Martin MakundiJan 20, 2011 10:51 pm 
Subject:Re: Free wicket from component hierarchy hell
From:James Carman (jam@carmanconsulting.com)
Date:Nov 10, 2010 4:31:05 am
List:org.apache.wicket.users

On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 3:49 AM, Carl-Eric Menzel <cmen@wicketbuch.de> wrote:

So either there is a difference between the forms (different submit method maybe?), then this move would make a semantic/behavioral difference and needs to be done in code.

As I said, the two forms edit different values on the same object. Yes, this change would be a semantic/behavioral change, but you could actually do it with just a change in the markup. It wouldn't require a change to the code. This is assuming you queue the fields onto the containing panel and not onto the contained forms, which is entirely possible (and even likely). How many times have you accidentally called add() when you meant to call rowItem.add() in a repeater? With the queue() method, you wouldn't get an error message saying the markup doesn't match. It would just figure it out and you'd be none the wiser.