atom feed34 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-usersRe: [courier-users] Standard Signatures
FromSent OnAttachments
Peter BurdenMar 18, 2008 5:01 am 
Gordon MessmerMar 18, 2008 8:17 am 
Harry DuncanMar 18, 2008 8:48 am 
Ben KennedyMar 18, 2008 12:00 pm 
Aidas KasparasMar 18, 2008 12:13 pm 
Harry DuncanMar 18, 2008 12:43 pm 
Harry DuncanMar 18, 2008 12:56 pm 
Norbert SchmidtMar 18, 2008 1:22 pm 
Gordon MessmerMar 18, 2008 5:55 pm 
Jerry AmundsonMar 19, 2008 9:58 am 
Gordon MessmerMar 19, 2008 11:47 am 
Harry DuncanMar 20, 2008 12:02 am 
Aidas KasparasMar 20, 2008 2:19 am 
Peter BurdenMar 20, 2008 4:03 am 
EndaMar 20, 2008 4:44 am 
Harry DuncanMar 20, 2008 4:47 am 
Gordon MessmerMar 20, 2008 9:04 am 
Peter BurdenApr 22, 2008 8:56 am 
Peter BurdenApr 22, 2008 8:57 am 
Gordon MessmerApr 23, 2008 12:22 am 
Peter BurdenApr 23, 2008 2:14 am 
Gordon MessmerApr 23, 2008 3:20 pm 
Peter BurdenApr 23, 2008 4:48 pm 
Gordon MessmerApr 23, 2008 9:27 pm 
Peter BurdenMay 12, 2008 9:06 am 
Aleksander AdamowskiMay 15, 2008 10:53 am 
Peter BurdenMay 15, 2008 3:33 pm 
Aleksander AdamowskiMay 16, 2008 2:49 am 
Peter BurdenJun 18, 2008 9:00 am 
Jeff JansenJun 18, 2008 5:45 pm 
Peter BurdenJun 19, 2008 1:56 pm 
Gordon MessmerJun 19, 2008 4:35 pm 
Jeff JansenJun 19, 2008 6:08 pm.patch
Peter BurdenJul 22, 2008 3:47 am 
Subject:Re: [courier-users] Standard Signatures
From:Harry Duncan (usr.@gmail.com)
Date:Mar 18, 2008 8:48:02 am
List:net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users

On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Gordon Messmer <yiny@eburg.com> wrote:

Peter Burden wrote:

The request is from senior management who are concerned that mail users can send out e-mail in which they have awarded themselves inappropriate job titles. Would it possible to make Courier append a standard signature (taken from a database) to outgoing e-mail, once users had authenticated themselves?

You could append a signature using a filter. You'd have to make sure that none of your users netblocks were listed as RELAYCLIENTs in smtpaccess, forcing them to use SMTP AUTH in order to relay mail.

Are you saying that you could not modify mails with filters if the mail is sent using SMTP AUTH?

However, even with all of that done, there's little or nothing stopping your users from sending email from somewhere else. You probably have too much senior management... they seem to be getting bored and worrying about non-existent threats.

Actually there is strict european legislation being enacted across the EU which is mandating that emails be boilerplated with full company legal name, legal structure and list of company principals, and failure to comply can mean 250K in fines and imprisionment. I'd say thats a very existent threat for any management to worry about.

Tell them that it's a waste of time and money, and that while you can append signatures, you can't force anyone to submit to using them.

I think that was teh point of the exercise, that doing it centrally you did force them to use it unless of course they leave the ranch in which case the company can't be repsonsible anyway.

Failing that would it be possible to examine outgoing e-mail and drop messages that didn't include the senders "approved" signature.

Sure. Slightly easier, but no less easily circumvented.

I would have thought this was harder given that it is next to impossible to pre-determine what constitutes a signature unless users follow the double dash and three line rules, which most don't..

Harry.