atom feed20 messages in org.apache.wicket.usersRe: encapsulation, extension and tran...
FromSent OnAttachments
Jan KriestenMay 12, 2008 2:08 am 
Martijn DashorstMay 12, 2008 4:07 am 
Jan KriestenMay 12, 2008 5:28 am 
Martijn DashorstMay 12, 2008 5:34 am 
Jan KriestenMay 12, 2008 5:39 am 
Igor VaynbergMay 12, 2008 8:25 am 
Johan CompagnerMay 12, 2008 8:34 am 
Jan KriestenMay 12, 2008 9:14 am 
Jan KriestenMay 12, 2008 9:17 am 
Igor VaynbergMay 12, 2008 10:12 am 
Jan KriestenMay 12, 2008 10:25 am 
Igor VaynbergMay 12, 2008 10:31 am 
Gerolf SeitzMay 12, 2008 3:00 pm 
Johan CompagnerMay 12, 2008 3:19 pm 
jWeekendMay 12, 2008 4:59 pm 
Jonathan LockeMay 12, 2008 6:24 pm 
Jonathan LockeMay 12, 2008 6:36 pm 
Eelco HilleniusMay 12, 2008 6:51 pm 
Jan KriestenMay 12, 2008 9:44 pm 
Jonathan LockeMay 12, 2008 10:52 pm 
Subject:Re: encapsulation, extension and transparent resolvers
From:Jan Kriesten (jan.@renitence.de)
Date:May 12, 2008 5:28:16 am
List:org.apache.wicket.users

hi martijn,

The 'We wont support this' dogma isn't really proper argumentation.

Are you providing the 24x7 free support then?

that's actually not the point, is it? i'm trying to help out on the irc channel as well as good as i can. so you can't claim that all yourself.

just get back to serious discussion and don't hide behind this statement you're repeating over and over.

as i stated, i really appreciate your work - but that doesn't mean one isn't allowed to formulate (light) criticism.

regards, --- jan.