atom feed9 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.soa-rmRE: [soa-rm] No vote for SOA-RM
FromSent OnAttachments
Laskey, KenSep 21, 2006 5:57 am 
Tom MerkleSep 21, 2006 5:59 am 
Duane NickullSep 21, 2006 8:08 am 
Rex BrooksSep 21, 2006 9:58 am 
Jeffrey A. EstefanSep 21, 2006 10:51 am 
McGr...@tbs-sct.gc.caSep 21, 2006 10:54 am 
Laskey, KenSep 21, 2006 11:00 am 
Duane NickullSep 21, 2006 11:11 am 
Duane NickullSep 21, 2006 11:11 am 
Subject:RE: [soa-rm] No vote for SOA-RM
From:Laskey, Ken (klas@mitre.org)
Date:Sep 21, 2006 11:00:57 am
List:org.oasis-open.lists.soa-rm

This list not only includes the kitchen sink but every dirty dish that was runored to be in it. A quick look shows he still has WSDL 1.2 as current and there may be other aberrations, but keeping such a list up to date would be a full time job. Talking about all of this in a reference model would have SOA-RM being an encyclopedia.

But I'll be interested if and how he responds to Duane's email.

Ken

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Jeffrey A. Estefan [mailto:jeff@jpl.nasa.gov] Sent: Thu 9/21/2006 1:51 PM To: soa@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [soa-rm] No vote for SOA-RM Duane,

Does it really matter if we get a couple of NO votes? I'm not familiar with the OASIS requirements on whether formal spec adoption as an official OASIS Standard requires a unanimous YES vote or not.

Incidentally, the Momentum folks are the ones who stood up the following site: [1]http://www.serviceoriented.org/service_oriented_enterprise.html

If you look at the list of SOA-related terms/contents at this link: [2]http://www.serviceoriented.org/table_of_contents.html

you can see where Jeff S. may be coming from in terms of completeness. I came across this material a couple of years ago. Also note that Jeff S. is the CEO of Momentum.

Cheers...

- Jeff

References

Visible links 1. http://www.serviceoriented.org/service_oriented_enterprise.html 2. http://www.serviceoriented.org/table_of_contents.html