atom feed8 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.ublRe: [ubl] Input into the versioning d...
FromSent OnAttachments
step...@systml.co.ukJun 27, 2007 12:37 pm 
Tim McGrathJun 27, 2007 4:56 pm 
Peter BorresenJun 28, 2007 1:41 am 
John LarmouthJun 28, 2007 2:01 am 
Mark LeitchJun 28, 2007 2:48 am 
G. Ken HolmanJun 28, 2007 6:52 am 
John LarmouthJun 28, 2007 8:55 am 
Mark LeitchJul 11, 2007 2:28 am 
Subject:Re: [ubl] Input into the versioning discussion
From:John Larmouth (j.la@salford.ac.uk)
Date:Jun 28, 2007 8:55:14 am
List:org.oasis-open.lists.ubl

To all,

I have nothing to comment on technically on Ken's mail - I agree with all his remarks/comments.

A few comments follow.

Thank you for chiming in on this, John.

You are welcome, if I can be helpful. But I tried not to be disrutptive.

At 2007-06-28 10:01 +0100, John Larmouth wrote: And a fun ride it is ... this is very timely and I'm looking forward to any feedback you may have on the documents published by the TC in this regard.

Will do my best, but I am contributing to, and also Editor of, *far* too many Standards - mainly in ISO Biometrics, ITU-T SG17 Recommendations, and IEC TC12 (with ISO TC25) on Quantites and Units - SI-related stuff.

My CPU fan can't take the heat of being truly active again in UBL, at least for the present.

Hopefully you might also consider participating in the discussions and contributing to the documents.

Ha! UBL *was* a main interest of mine a few years back (so I remained on the mailing list), but becoming really active again is very very iffy - sorry.

Sorry that this reply is a bit negative, but needs must.

John L