atom feed24 messages in at.iem.pd-devRe: [PD-dev] saving preset pools in t...
FromSent OnAttachments
B. BogartNov 11, 2004 12:28 pm 
Frank BarknechtNov 11, 2004 2:14 pm 
ixNov 11, 2004 2:31 pm 
Hans-Christoph SteinerNov 11, 2004 3:09 pm 
Frank BarknechtNov 11, 2004 3:20 pm 
Frank BarknechtNov 11, 2004 3:26 pm 
guenter geigerNov 12, 2004 1:23 am 
Frank BarknechtNov 12, 2004 1:53 am 
guenter geigerNov 12, 2004 2:55 am.c
B. BogartNov 12, 2004 8:52 am 
Frank BarknechtNov 12, 2004 10:09 am 
Frank BarknechtNov 12, 2004 12:32 pm 
B. BogartNov 12, 2004 1:03 pm 
Frank BarknechtNov 16, 2004 3:12 am.tgz
ixNov 16, 2004 3:34 am 
Frank BarknechtNov 17, 2004 11:21 am 
B. BogartNov 17, 2004 11:47 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerNov 17, 2004 8:39 pm 
Frank BarknechtNov 17, 2004 10:51 pm 
guenter geigerNov 18, 2004 1:47 am 
Frank BarknechtNov 18, 2004 2:15 am 
guenter geigerNov 18, 2004 3:43 am 
Krzysztof CzajaNov 18, 2004 5:09 am 
Frank BarknechtNov 18, 2004 8:08 am 
Subject:Re: [PD-dev] saving preset pools in the parent path, rather than the abstraction path?
From:Frank Barknecht (fb@footils.org)
Date:Nov 11, 2004 3:26:36 pm
List:at.iem.pd-dev

Hallo, ix hat gesagt: // ix wrote:

ive always just done this, but i guess if you open another patch in the meantime it might be off..

I'm sure, this is possible, for example also with "shell" and basename etc. I'd rather like to discuss, if having to know the parent path generally is needed, if it's a sign of a design error in a patch or if it's a design error in Pd, not to provide this funcionality? It's a very interesting question, which comes up regularily here.

Ciao

-- Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__