atom feed20 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.officeRe: [office] style name uniquness
FromSent OnAttachments
Lars OppermannJan 11, 2006 9:26 am 
Bruce D'ArcusJan 11, 2006 10:22 am 
Lars OppermannJan 12, 2006 2:36 am 
Bruce D'ArcusJan 12, 2006 6:51 am 
Bruce D'ArcusJan 12, 2006 7:16 am 
David FaureMar 10, 2006 10:33 am 
Patrick DurusauMar 11, 2006 4:40 pm 
David FaureMar 13, 2006 2:36 pm 
Daniel CarreraMar 13, 2006 2:57 pm 
Florian ReuterMar 14, 2006 1:00 am 
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - HamburgMar 14, 2006 1:18 am 
Florian ReuterMar 14, 2006 2:08 am 
David A. WheelerMar 14, 2006 8:17 am 
David FaureJan 4, 2008 1:55 am 
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - HamburgJan 24, 2008 4:55 am 
David FaureFeb 4, 2008 7:53 am 
David FaureFeb 4, 2008 8:04 am 
Patrick DurusauFeb 4, 2008 8:27 am 
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - HamburgFeb 22, 2008 6:15 am 
David FaureFeb 22, 2008 7:19 am 
Subject:Re: [office] style name uniquness
From:David Faure (fau@kde.org)
Date:Feb 4, 2008 7:53:40 am
List:org.oasis-open.lists.office

On Thursday 24 January 2008, Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg wrote:

It is recommended that applications do not generate names that are used already for styles with the given family contained in the <office:styles> element of the same document.

The reader of this paragraph is really going to wonder why we say "recommended" here while above we say "The <office:styles>[...] elements each must not contain two styles with the same family and the same name."

I know the difference between the two sentences (the one you added is about other office:styles elements in other xml files), but I think it should be said in a clearer way. Maybe "... <office:styles> elements of the same document, including those from other xml files in the package" -- or whatever the right terms are for those things in the specification :)