30 messages in org.openldap.openldap-softwareRe: LDAPS vs. StartTLS ext. op.
FromSent OnAttachments
Emmanuel DreyfusJul 23, 2007 6:50 am 
Quanah Gibson-MountJul 23, 2007 11:01 am 
Emmanuel DreyfusJul 23, 2007 1:09 pm 
Quanah Gibson-MountJul 23, 2007 1:18 pm 
Russ AllberyJul 23, 2007 4:35 pm 
Christopher CowartJul 23, 2007 7:40 pm 
Howard ChuJul 23, 2007 9:58 pm 
Emmanuel DreyfusJul 24, 2007 1:02 am 
Howard ChuJul 24, 2007 1:54 am 
Emmanuel DreyfusJul 24, 2007 12:18 pm 
Quanah Gibson-MountJul 25, 2007 8:52 am 
Emmanuel DreyfusJul 25, 2007 9:06 am 
Quanah Gibson-MountJul 25, 2007 9:47 am 
Michael StröderJul 25, 2007 9:53 am 
Emmanuel DreyfusJul 25, 2007 10:36 am 
Quanah Gibson-MountJul 25, 2007 10:46 am 
Howard ChuJul 25, 2007 2:31 pm 
Michael StröderJul 25, 2007 2:38 pm 
Howard ChuJul 25, 2007 2:44 pm 
Russ AllberyJul 25, 2007 2:45 pm 
Norman GaywoodJul 25, 2007 3:04 pm 
Emmanuel DreyfusJul 25, 2007 8:30 pm 
Emmanuel DreyfusJul 25, 2007 8:31 pm 
Howard ChuJul 25, 2007 11:17 pm 
Ralf HaferkampJul 26, 2007 1:27 am 
Emmanuel DreyfusJul 26, 2007 4:04 am 
Emmanuel DreyfusJul 26, 2007 4:04 am 
Donn CaveJul 26, 2007 9:38 am 
Ralf HaferkampJul 26, 2007 11:46 am 
Howard ChuJul 27, 2007 2:13 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: LDAPS vs. StartTLS ext. op.Actions...
From:Michael Ströder (mich@stroeder.com)
Date:Jul 25, 2007 2:38:55 pm
List:org.openldap.openldap-software

Howard Chu wrote:

Michael Ströder wrote:

=> If the OpenLDAP developers were really crazy enough to remove support for LDAPS from OpenLDAP I'd kick OpenLDAP out of my business immediately. Period.

If someone at IANA were to tell us that this number assignment was officially withdrawn, then we would drop it. We really wouldn't have much choice, nor would any other implementor that wanted to claim that their LDAP product was fully IETF-compliant.

Sorry, but the assignment of a port number by IANA is not really required for supporting LDAP over SSL/TLS on a separate port since you could happily use ldaps://host:636 or any other port anyway and still be IETF-compliant.

Ciao, Michael.