atom feed34 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-usersRe: [courier-users] Standard Signatures
FromSent OnAttachments
Peter BurdenMar 18, 2008 5:01 am 
Gordon MessmerMar 18, 2008 8:17 am 
Harry DuncanMar 18, 2008 8:48 am 
Ben KennedyMar 18, 2008 12:00 pm 
Aidas KasparasMar 18, 2008 12:13 pm 
Harry DuncanMar 18, 2008 12:43 pm 
Harry DuncanMar 18, 2008 12:56 pm 
Norbert SchmidtMar 18, 2008 1:22 pm 
Gordon MessmerMar 18, 2008 5:55 pm 
Jerry AmundsonMar 19, 2008 9:58 am 
Gordon MessmerMar 19, 2008 11:47 am 
Harry DuncanMar 20, 2008 12:02 am 
Aidas KasparasMar 20, 2008 2:19 am 
Peter BurdenMar 20, 2008 4:03 am 
EndaMar 20, 2008 4:44 am 
Harry DuncanMar 20, 2008 4:47 am 
Gordon MessmerMar 20, 2008 9:04 am 
Peter BurdenApr 22, 2008 8:56 am 
Peter BurdenApr 22, 2008 8:57 am 
Gordon MessmerApr 23, 2008 12:22 am 
Peter BurdenApr 23, 2008 2:14 am 
Gordon MessmerApr 23, 2008 3:20 pm 
Peter BurdenApr 23, 2008 4:48 pm 
Gordon MessmerApr 23, 2008 9:27 pm 
Peter BurdenMay 12, 2008 9:06 am 
Aleksander AdamowskiMay 15, 2008 10:53 am 
Peter BurdenMay 15, 2008 3:33 pm 
Aleksander AdamowskiMay 16, 2008 2:49 am 
Peter BurdenJun 18, 2008 9:00 am 
Jeff JansenJun 18, 2008 5:45 pm 
Peter BurdenJun 19, 2008 1:56 pm 
Gordon MessmerJun 19, 2008 4:35 pm 
Jeff JansenJun 19, 2008 6:08 pm.patch
Peter BurdenJul 22, 2008 3:47 am 
Subject:Re: [courier-users] Standard Signatures
From:Jerry Amundson (jamu@gmail.com)
Date:Mar 19, 2008 9:58:19 am
List:net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users

On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Gordon Messmer <yiny@eburg.com> wrote:

Harry Duncan wrote:

On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Gordon Messmer <yiny@eburg.com> wrote:

Are you saying that you could not modify mails with filters if the mail is sent using SMTP AUTH?

You can modify mail regardless of whether or not AUTH is used.

But the AUTH would give a per-user hook for out-bound scripting purposes...

However, even with all of that done, there's little or nothing stopping your users from sending email from somewhere else. You probably have too much senior management... they seem to be getting bored and worrying about non-existent threats.

Actually there is strict european legislation being enacted across the EU which is mandating that emails be boilerplated with full company legal name, legal structure and list of company principals, and failure to comply can mean 250K in fines and imprisionment. I'd say thats a very existent threat for any management to worry about.

That's not what was asked.

But a solution to either one solves both. Basically, aren't we saying(?): 1. As a company, mandate *no* signatures on the mail client for the company account. 2. Require SMTP AUTH. 3. Globally filter such that the script uses auth info to lookup fullname, title, etc. externally 4. Add txt/html formatted signature as needed. See? Simple. ;-)

jerry