10 messages in ru.sysoev.nginxRe: Does any module support the heath...
FromSent OnAttachments
ChieuMay 31, 2009 3:55 am 
mingjiang huangJun 8, 2009 2:25 am 
Michael ShadleJun 8, 2009 1:11 pm 
Avleen VigJun 9, 2009 4:01 am 
Michael ShadleJun 9, 2009 10:13 am 
merlin coreyJun 10, 2009 2:20 pm 
Michael ShadleJun 10, 2009 2:27 pm 
merlin coreyJun 10, 2009 2:44 pm 
Michael ShadleJun 10, 2009 2:58 pm 
ChieuJun 10, 2009 8:40 pm 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: Does any module support the heathy check of the backend upstreams?Actions...
From:merlin corey (merl@dc949.org)
Date:Jun 10, 2009 2:44:41 pm
List:ru.sysoev.nginx

How often do you really expect servers to go up and down? I think you are correct, though, HUP can take a bit of time/resources. My point is, are you really having upstreams die constantly? Seems like you would have much worse problems than what it takes to HUP at that point...

-- Merlin

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Michael Shadle<mike@gmail.com> wrote:

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:21 PM, merlin corey <merl@dc949.org> wrote:

What is so wrong with this?  Also, just for clarity (though I think you meant it too) the external process can manage the upstreams.conf and HUP nginx automatically!  You might even be able to get something like this going pretty quick with some small modifications to monit or something similar!

It just seems a bit messy to HUP the server which probably does a lot more work than updating an upstream array/construct.