7 messages in net.java.dev.trails.devRe: [trails-dev] Wrails| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Alejandro Scandroli | Feb 24, 2007 3:52 am | |
| Brian Topping | Feb 24, 2007 4:01 am | |
| Kalle Korhonen | Feb 24, 2007 4:34 am | |
| Brian Topping | Feb 24, 2007 5:26 am | |
| Kalle Korhonen | Feb 24, 2007 5:38 am | |
| Ken nashua | Feb 26, 2007 6:46 am | |
| Ken nashua | Feb 26, 2007 7:09 am |
| Subject: | Re: [trails-dev] Wrails | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Brian Topping (topp...@codehaus.org) | |
| Date: | Feb 24, 2007 5:26:15 am | |
| List: | net.java.dev.trails.dev | |
On Feb 24, 2007, at 4:34 AM, Kalle Korhonen wrote:
Looks pretty recent to me:
Fuel on the fire, eh? Heh. The front page of the Trails project looks like it's changed almost just as recently!
Instead of spending your time with witty comebacks and crack investigative reporting, why spend some time considering how to deliver on the promise that DDD has for the rest of the community and the world at large. Get outside your comfort zone a little and see what's going in that wide wide world! Want to write some code?
Or is it easier to size up anyone doing anything that you don't understand as a threat, then minimize it?
The basic fact that Trails uses Tapestry and Senro uses Wicket should say something to you guys about whether there is room for more Trails code to come over.
That it didn't just simply says to me that you don't have a clue about Wicket, which is sad. Not that *you* are sad -- it's sad you are missing the evolution.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not ragging on Tapestry, but I'm not going to bank my retirement on it any more than I'm going to do that with Wicket, or any other framework that follows it for that matter.
Are we done now? I certainly hope so.
Brian