6 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-maildrop[maildropl] Re: maildrop and couriermlm
FromSent OnAttachments
ma...@mediadriver.comJan 15, 2003 3:00 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 15, 2003 3:19 pm 
ma...@mediadriver.comJan 16, 2003 9:21 am 
Sam VarshavchikJan 16, 2003 2:51 pm 
ma...@mediadriver.comJan 17, 2003 1:45 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 17, 2003 2:35 pm 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:[maildropl] Re: maildrop and couriermlmActions...
From:Sam Varshavchik (mrs@courier-mta.com)
Date:Jan 17, 2003 2:35:41 pm
List:net.sourceforge.lists.courier-maildrop

ma@mediadriver.com writes:

Could you elaborate a little bit more? If I configure courier-mta to use maildrop as its delivery mode, why would I want to call maildrop from .courier?

The best of both worlds. Some things work better from a .courier file. There's no reason not to have both.

I intended to use maildrop for user delivery as it makes it easier to support features (from a provisioning standpoint) such as:

*server side sorting/filtering *autoreplies *store and forward *spam filtering *virus filtering

How do you recommend configuring courier to support these features?

Set Courier to use maildrop by default. Where necessary, install a .courier file.