Please check the ERRATA info carefully.
Nothing about compat22 is reported on it.
Actually I think this information can be found in 3.1-R && 3.2-R's ERRTA.
Your PR just implied "Some 3.x users could have trouble of missing
ld.so" but it is not true. The truth is 3.1-R lacked with (aout) ld.so ,
you need to install compat22 distribution; and 3.2-R missed its
installation directory from /usr/lib/compat(right place) to
/usr/lib/compat/aout(wrong place). Those file in /usr/lib/compat now
should be ELF format.
I don't think it is necessary to include these information to FAQ. You
can check it out from the errata file of every release version. And I
encourage people to do so.
I've carefully read the erratas again and found that they aren't
saying about a problem of my PR.
The 3.1 errata says about registration of aout libs after
installing compat22. The 3.2 errata says nothing about compat22.
My PR is about `How to let users know that they should install compat22
before installing aout applications like netscape.'
I've seen a lot of such questions on ML and direct mail to me from
new 3.2 users.
This seems to be a pure FAQ and now I recommend importing the entry into
Any objection ?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo...@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message