8 messages in com.mysql.lists.mysqlRe: 400,000 records is some limit to ...| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Dino | 29 Jul 1999 13:00 | |
| Ralph Graulich | 29 Jul 1999 14:45 | |
| Jani Tolonen | 29 Jul 1999 20:13 | |
| Scott Hess | 30 Jul 1999 10:52 | |
| Van | 30 Jul 1999 13:01 | |
| Darrell Shifflett | 30 Jul 1999 13:04 | |
| Scott Hess | 30 Jul 1999 13:49 | |
| Fred Lindberg | 30 Jul 1999 16:13 |
| Subject: | Re: 400,000 records is some limit to mysql?![]() |
|---|---|
| From: | Scott Hess (sco...@avantgo.com) |
| Date: | 07/30/1999 01:49:00 PM |
| List: | com.mysql.lists.mysql |
Odd. I saw it today on a couple from Monty (myISAM vs ISAM, MYSQL error? (fwd)) from Monty, another couple from Sinise (Novice Question, DISTINCT), and another bunch from Jani (Error: Too many connections, Newbie perl script error, perl upgrade...). As far as I can tell, it's not my email client, when I go look at the headers, the Re:'s aren't there (they aren't there in the listquest archives, either).
It's not that it pisses me off or anything - it's just that I keep missing things that I might have wanted to see! [I can't afford to read _everything_ that comes across this list (Scott says, as he uselessly contributes to other people's email backlog).] I figured since the majority of these Re-less emails seem to be coming from TCX, perhaps it was something to do with a system they have there for responding to this list, which may be easy to fix in a central location.
Back to your regularily scheduled program, scott
----- Original Message ----- From: Darrell Shifflett <pe...@torch.BLUEZnet.com> To: Scott Hess <sco...@avantgo.com> Cc: <ja...@tcx.se>; Dino <di...@gold.com.br>; <mys...@lists.mysql.com> Sent: Friday, July 30, 1999 1:04 PM Subject: Re: 400,000 records is some limit to mysql?
On Fri, 30 Jul 1999, Scott Hess wrote:
I notice that a number of TCX people tend not to use "Re: " on their subjects lines in responses. Any reason why not? I'm not bitching, mind you, it's just that I often tend to delete messages which aren't in response to other messages, on the theory that the response is generally the more interesting thing.
Hmm, i see Re: on every reply from the TCX team.
Fix: Read all your mail
========================================================== * Darrell Shifflett | Blueznet Internet Services * * Senior Sys/Adm | Senior Sys/Adm/Owner * * Team Linux 2000 | blu...@blueznet.com * * http://www.linux-2000.org | http://www.blueznet.com * ==========================================================




