151 messages in org.w3.public-lodRe: Is 303 really necessary?| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| 71 earlier messages | ||
| Leigh Dodds | Nov 5, 2010 2:41 am | |
| William Waites | Nov 5, 2010 2:53 am | |
| Ian Davis | Nov 5, 2010 2:57 am | |
| Nathan | Nov 5, 2010 3:05 am | |
| Nathan | Nov 5, 2010 3:12 am | |
| Ian Davis | Nov 5, 2010 3:16 am | |
| Ian Davis | Nov 5, 2010 3:24 am | |
| Nathan | Nov 5, 2010 3:33 am | |
| Ian Davis | Nov 5, 2010 3:40 am | |
| Nathan | Nov 5, 2010 3:56 am | |
| Ian Davis | Nov 5, 2010 3:59 am | |
| Ian Davis | Nov 5, 2010 4:01 am | |
| Nathan | Nov 5, 2010 4:14 am | |
| Mischa Tuffield | Nov 5, 2010 4:47 am | |
| Norman Gray | Nov 5, 2010 5:11 am | |
| Dave Reynolds | Nov 5, 2010 5:38 am | |
| Nathan | Nov 5, 2010 5:52 am | |
| Nathan | Nov 5, 2010 5:56 am | |
| Vasiliy Faronov | Nov 5, 2010 6:00 am | |
| Vasiliy Faronov | Nov 5, 2010 6:33 am | |
| Nathan | Nov 5, 2010 7:17 am | |
| David Wood | Nov 5, 2010 7:18 am | |
| Pat Hayes | Nov 5, 2010 7:27 am | |
| Ian Davis | Nov 5, 2010 8:12 am | |
| Kingsley Idehen | Nov 5, 2010 8:18 am | |
| Nathan | Nov 5, 2010 8:39 am | |
| Kingsley Idehen | Nov 5, 2010 9:35 am | |
| Pat Hayes | Nov 5, 2010 10:29 am | |
| Kingsley Idehen | Nov 5, 2010 10:30 am | |
| Nathan | Nov 5, 2010 10:37 am | |
| Hugh Glaser | Nov 5, 2010 10:50 am | |
| David Booth | Nov 6, 2010 1:41 pm | |
| Norman Gray | Nov 6, 2010 3:45 pm | |
| Kingsley Idehen | Nov 6, 2010 4:07 pm | |
| David Booth | Nov 7, 2010 10:27 pm | |
| David Booth | Nov 7, 2010 10:27 pm | |
| Tore Eriksson | Nov 7, 2010 11:17 pm | |
| Toby Inkster | Nov 8, 2010 12:36 am | |
| Toby Inkster | Nov 8, 2010 2:10 am | |
| David Booth | Nov 8, 2010 6:39 am | |
| David Booth | Nov 8, 2010 6:42 am | |
| Norman Gray | Nov 8, 2010 7:51 am | |
| Toby Inkster | Nov 8, 2010 8:03 am | |
| David Booth | Nov 8, 2010 12:33 pm | |
| Lars Heuer | Nov 8, 2010 1:16 pm | |
| David Booth | Nov 8, 2010 1:35 pm | |
| Dave Reynolds | Nov 8, 2010 1:50 pm | |
| David Booth | Nov 8, 2010 3:34 pm | |
| Tore Eriksson | Nov 8, 2010 5:51 pm | |
| Dave Reynolds | Nov 9, 2010 6:36 am | |
| Lars Heuer | Nov 9, 2010 8:00 am | |
| Kjetil Kjernsmo | Nov 10, 2010 7:13 am | |
| Jason Borro | Nov 11, 2010 11:47 am | |
| David Booth | Nov 18, 2010 2:09 pm | |
| Kingsley Idehen | Nov 19, 2010 4:25 am | |
| David Booth | Nov 19, 2010 1:55 pm | |
| Kingsley Idehen | Nov 19, 2010 2:07 pm | |
| Nathan | Nov 19, 2010 2:57 pm | |
| Kingsley Idehen | Nov 19, 2010 5:55 pm | |
| Bob Ferris | Nov 26, 2010 6:15 am | |
| Nathan | Nov 26, 2010 6:29 am | |
| David Booth | Nov 26, 2010 9:32 am | |
| David Booth | Nov 26, 2010 9:48 am | |
| Kingsley Idehen | Nov 26, 2010 12:36 pm | |
| William Waites | Nov 26, 2010 1:47 pm | |
| Kingsley Idehen | Nov 26, 2010 6:05 pm | |
| Richard Light | Nov 27, 2010 4:47 am | |
| Tim Berners-Lee | Nov 27, 2010 12:24 pm | |
| William Waites | Nov 28, 2010 5:47 am | |
| Giovanni Tummarello | Nov 28, 2010 5:51 am | |
| Jiří Procházka | Nov 28, 2010 6:46 am | |
| Tim Berners-Lee | Nov 28, 2010 7:07 am | |
| Kingsley Idehen | Nov 28, 2010 9:45 am | |
| Jiří Procházka | Nov 28, 2010 12:51 pm | |
| Toby Inkster | Nov 28, 2010 3:27 pm | |
| Kingsley Idehen | Nov 28, 2010 3:47 pm | |
| Jiří Procházka | Nov 28, 2010 4:51 pm | |
| Kingsley Idehen | Nov 28, 2010 5:15 pm | |
| James Leigh | Nov 29, 2010 5:54 am | |
| Bob Ferris | Dec 14, 2010 2:54 pm | |
| Subject: | Re: Is 303 really necessary? | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Dave Reynolds (dave...@gmail.com) | |
| Date: | Nov 9, 2010 6:36:12 am | |
| List: | org.w3.public-lod | |
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 22:17 +0100, Lars Heuer wrote:
Hi Ian,
Even if I come from a slightly different camp (Topic Maps), I wonder if your proposal hasn't become reality already. Try to resolve rdf:type or rdfs:label: I think we agree that these resources describe abstract concepts and should not return 200 but 303. Both return 200.
Those are hash URIs, for example, the rdf:type expands to the URI:
http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type
As it says [1] in the RDF specs:
""the RDF treatment of a fragment identifier allows it to indicate a thing that is entirely external to the document, or even to the "shared information space" known as the Web. That is, it can be a more general idea, like some particular car or a mythical Unicorn""
So those are perfectly fine. Ian's proposal and the discussion here has been entirely about URIs without fragment identifiers, so called "slash URIs".
Dave
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/#section-fragID - though that is an Informative rather than Normative section of the concepts document.