atom feed8 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.ebsoaRE: [ebsoa] Clarification on Patterns
FromSent OnAttachments
Chiusano JosephMay 25, 2004 6:05 am 
David RR WebberMay 25, 2004 6:11 am 
Matthew MacKenzieMay 25, 2004 11:19 am 
Matthew MacKenzieMay 25, 2004 11:21 am 
David RR WebberMay 25, 2004 2:43 pm 
Duane NickullMay 26, 2004 1:13 am 
Matthew MacKenzieMay 26, 2004 5:11 am 
David RR WebberMay 26, 2004 6:43 am 
Subject:RE: [ebsoa] Clarification on Patterns
From:Matthew MacKenzie (mat@adobe.com)
Date:May 25, 2004 11:21:19 am
List:org.oasis-open.lists.ebsoa

Take a look at what I am proposing in the latest draft. Its not so much a pattern language as a template for describing the abstract patterns we are addressing.

Thanks, Matt

-----Original Message----- From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:chiu@bah.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:09 AM To: ebSOA Subject: [ebsoa] Clarification on Patterns

I'm taking a step back and re-examining our discussions on patterns that have occurred over the past several weeks, and have some questions please:

(1) I know we've said that we've decided that we would create a pattern language - is that what we *really* want? Is it too low-level (i.e. toward assembly language) for the purposes of this TC? Patterns can be conveyed without the use of a pattern language, as IBM does in their SOA Patterns redbook.

(2) What are some examples of existing pattern languages? I did not see any glaring references in any of the e-mail threads.