| Subject: | RE: [ebsoa] Clarification on Patterns | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Matthew MacKenzie (mat...@adobe.com) | |
| Date: | May 25, 2004 11:21:19 am | |
| List: | org.oasis-open.lists.ebsoa | |
Refine Search
| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Chiusano Joseph | May 25, 2004 6:05 am | |
| David RR Webber | May 25, 2004 6:11 am | |
| Matthew MacKenzie | May 25, 2004 11:19 am | |
| Matthew MacKenzie | May 25, 2004 11:21 am | |
| David RR Webber | May 25, 2004 2:43 pm | |
| Duane Nickull | May 26, 2004 1:13 am | |
| Matthew MacKenzie | May 26, 2004 5:11 am | |
| David RR Webber | May 26, 2004 6:43 am |
| Subject: | RE: [ebsoa] Clarification on Patterns | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Matthew MacKenzie (mat...@adobe.com) | |
| Date: | May 25, 2004 11:21:19 am | |
| List: | org.oasis-open.lists.ebsoa | |
Take a look at what I am proposing in the latest draft. Its not so much a pattern language as a template for describing the abstract patterns we are addressing.
Thanks, Matt
-----Original Message----- From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:chiu...@bah.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 8:09 AM To: ebSOA Subject: [ebsoa] Clarification on Patterns
I'm taking a step back and re-examining our discussions on patterns that have occurred over the past several weeks, and have some questions please:
(1) I know we've said that we've decided that we would create a pattern language - is that what we *really* want? Is it too low-level (i.e. toward assembly language) for the purposes of this TC? Patterns can be conveyed without the use of a pattern language, as IBM does in their SOA Patterns redbook.
(2) What are some examples of existing pattern languages? I did not see any glaring references in any of the e-mail threads.
Thanks, Joe
-- Kind Regards, Joseph Chiusano Associate Booz | Allen | Hamilton

