Can we go back a few steps, and check what we agree on.

Where I think we are at is:

i) we agree that we change the spec to allow the value queryType to determine
which parameter(s) contain the query. The default is that the query will be
passed via a parameter called "query", but a specific queryType can specify
otherwise.

ii) we agree that we should introduce a new queryType to handle Tony's use case.
This queryType will use different parameters to pass the query than the "query"
parameter.

Where we still need to agree:

i) the name for this new queryType - or are we happy with "cql-form"

ii) the status of this queryType - normative, non-normative but included in
spec; Nature specific extension etc. I would favour that this is at least a
non-normative part of the spec.

ii) the syntax for this queryType a) the need for "queryn" parameter - although I think we've probably reached
the conclusion it is needed b) leading versus trailing Booleans c) exact names for the parameters (although q[i|r|t|b]<n> seems the current
candidate).

Matthew