

![]() | Start a set with this search |
![]() | Include this search in one of my sets |
![]() | Exclude this search from one of my sets |
![]() | Permalink to these results Paste this link in email or IM: |
| Atom feed for tracking future search results Paste this URL into your reader: |
38 messages in net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp[c-nsp] VLSM| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Shaun | Jan 10, 2005 4:53 pm | |
| Gert Doering | Jan 10, 2005 5:26 pm | |
| Stephen J. Wilcox | Jan 10, 2005 5:27 pm | |
| matthew zeier | Jan 10, 2005 5:46 pm | |
| Shaun | Jan 10, 2005 6:19 pm | |
| Michael Smith | Jan 10, 2005 6:26 pm | |
| Stephen J. Wilcox | Jan 10, 2005 6:28 pm | |
| lis...@hojmark.org | Jan 10, 2005 6:55 pm | |
| Brant I. Stevens | Jan 10, 2005 11:25 pm | |
| Gert Doering | Jan 11, 2005 2:33 am | |
| Stephen J. Wilcox | Jan 11, 2005 6:11 am | |
| Mark Persiko | Jan 11, 2005 10:49 am | |
| Gert Doering | Jan 11, 2005 11:22 am | |
| Hudson Delbert J Contr 61 CS/SCBN | Jan 11, 2005 12:11 pm | |
| Brant I. Stevens | Jan 11, 2005 12:45 pm | |
| Pete Templin | Jan 11, 2005 12:52 pm | |
| Stephen J. Wilcox | Jan 11, 2005 1:30 pm | |
| Stephen J. Wilcox | Jan 11, 2005 1:39 pm | |
| Pete Templin | Jan 11, 2005 2:09 pm | |
| Gert Doering | Jan 11, 2005 2:47 pm | |
| Gert Doering | Jan 11, 2005 2:48 pm | |
| matthew zeier | Jan 11, 2005 3:09 pm | |
| lis...@hojmark.org | Jan 11, 2005 5:22 pm | |
| Anson Rinesmith | Jan 11, 2005 5:47 pm | |
| Michael Loftis | Jan 11, 2005 5:57 pm | |
| Stephen J. Wilcox | Jan 11, 2005 7:23 pm | |
| Stephen J. Wilcox | Jan 11, 2005 7:37 pm | |
| Shaun | Jan 11, 2005 8:31 pm | |
| Jon Lewis | Jan 11, 2005 9:48 pm | |
| Majid Farid | Jan 12, 2005 12:24 am | |
| matthew zeier | Jan 12, 2005 1:23 am | |
| Ted Mittelstaedt | Jan 12, 2005 1:41 am | |
| Ted Mittelstaedt | Jan 12, 2005 1:44 am | |
| Ted Mittelstaedt | Jan 12, 2005 1:51 am | |
| lis...@hojmark.org | Jan 12, 2005 1:18 pm | |
| lis...@hojmark.org | Jan 12, 2005 1:30 pm | |
| Shaun | Jan 13, 2005 4:05 am | |
| Ted Mittelstaedt | Jan 14, 2005 12:29 am |

![]() | Permalink for this message Paste this link in email or IM: |
![]() | Permalink for this thread Paste this link in email or IM: |
| Atom feed for this thread Paste this URL into your reader: |
| Subject: | [c-nsp] VLSM | Actions... |
|---|---|---|
| From: | matthew zeier (mr...@intelenet.net) | |
| Date: | Jan 12, 2005 1:23:21 am | |
| List: | net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp | |
When my sales droids and customers ask for a class C, they get told that we don't have any class C addresses available, but they can have an appropriate subnet of one of our ARIN allocations when they fill out a justification form. We include a blurb about subnetting and slash
What do you use for your "justification form"?
I wrote a document that describes why we need justification and sort of mirrors ARIN's form (sample available on request). I've inserted it into the sales process - nothing moves forward until we have a signed contract and the IP form (without it, we default to /29s). And us IP provisioning guys are such a hard ass about it that sales knows not to bother assigning a ticket over unless they have that form.
During contract renewals we nmap their address space and if it doesn't meet our requirements we ask for justification again. At this point they either justify and we like or we change netmask or customer forks over more money. The latter seems to encourage one other first two options.
And in some cases additional /24s are so "cost prohibitive" that the customer's encouraged to plead their case to ARIN and get their own space.







