Bugs item #796042, was opened at 2003-08-27 11:09
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by fdrake
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=796042&group_id=5470
Category: Distutils
Group: Python 2.3
Status: Open
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Anna Ravenscroft (annarave)
Assigned to: Fred L. Drake, Jr. (fdrake)
Summary: sdist ignores scripts argument in setup
Initial Comment:
When writing the setup script for a distribution, section 3.4 explains:
3.4 Installing Scripts
So far we have been dealing with pure and non-pure Python modules, which are
usually not run by themselves but imported by scripts.
Scripts are files containing Python source code, intended to be started from the
command line. Scripts don't require Distutils to do anything very
complicated. The only clever feature is that if the first line of the script
starts with #! and contains the word ``python'', the Distutils will
adjust the first line to refer to the current interpreter location.
The scripts option simply is a list of files to be handled in this way. From the
PyXML setup script:
setup (...
scripts = ['scripts/xmlproc_parse',
'scripts/xmlproc_val']
)
Unfortunately, this doesn't work with sdist unless you ALSO create a
manifest.in file. Otherwise, it silently ignores the scripts listed in setup.
bdist works just fine, so it's apparently something wrong in sdist.
Please fix this. Thank you.
Anna Ravenscroft
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Fred L. Drake, Jr. (fdrake)
Date: 2004-03-30 21:03
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=3066
Added note about inclusion of scripts in Doc/dist/dist.tex
revision 1.73. This should be back-ported along with the
actual fix.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Fred L. Drake, Jr. (fdrake)
Date: 2004-03-25 17:17
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=3066
This is fixed on the trunk as
Lib/distutils/command/build_scripts.py 1.22 and sdist.py 1.57.
I'm not entirely sure this should be backported for Python
2.3.x, but it probably should be.
----------------------------------------------------------------------