 | Start a set with this search |
 | Include this search in one of my sets |
 | Exclude this search from one of my sets |
 | Permalink to these results Paste this link in email or IM: |
 | Atom feed for tracking future search results Paste this URL into your reader: |
47 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-usersRe: [courier-users] Re: Failed to cre...| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Jonathan Chong | Dec 27, 2005 4:14 pm | |
| Gordon Messmer | Dec 27, 2005 4:35 pm | |
| Sam Varshavchik | Dec 27, 2005 7:08 pm | |
| Jonathan Chong | Dec 28, 2005 5:39 am | |
| Gordon Messmer | Dec 28, 2005 8:04 am | |
| Jonathan Chong | Dec 28, 2005 8:12 am | |
| Gordon Messmer | Dec 28, 2005 8:36 am | |
| Jeff Jansen | Dec 28, 2005 8:59 am | |
| Jonathan Chong | Dec 28, 2005 10:04 am | |
| Jeff Jansen | Dec 28, 2005 10:29 am | |
| Jonathan Chong | Dec 28, 2005 10:33 am | |
| Jonathan Chong | Dec 28, 2005 10:38 am | |
| Gordon Messmer | Dec 28, 2005 11:00 am | |
| Tony Earnshaw | Dec 28, 2005 11:01 am | |
| Jeff Jansen | Dec 28, 2005 11:42 am | |
| Gordon Messmer | Dec 28, 2005 11:52 am | |
| Jeff Jansen | Dec 28, 2005 12:22 pm | |
| Jonathan Chong | Dec 28, 2005 12:55 pm | |
| Tony Earnshaw | Dec 28, 2005 1:34 pm | |
| Jonathan Chong | Dec 28, 2005 1:55 pm | |
| Tony Earnshaw | Dec 28, 2005 2:00 pm | |
| Jonathan Chong | Dec 28, 2005 2:49 pm | |
| Jerry Amundson | Dec 28, 2005 6:25 pm | |
| Tony Earnshaw | Dec 28, 2005 11:32 pm | |
| Jonathan Chong | Dec 29, 2005 12:01 am | |
| Jonathan Chong | Dec 29, 2005 3:24 am | |
| Tony Earnshaw | Dec 29, 2005 6:05 am | |
| Jonathan Chong | Dec 29, 2005 6:57 am | |
| Jonathan Chong | Dec 29, 2005 7:03 am | |
| Tony Earnshaw | Dec 29, 2005 7:32 am | |
| Tony Earnshaw | Dec 29, 2005 7:37 am | |
| Jerry Amundson | Dec 29, 2005 8:27 am | |
| Tony Earnshaw | Dec 29, 2005 8:38 am | |
| Jonathan Chong | Dec 29, 2005 8:42 am | |
| Tony Earnshaw | Dec 29, 2005 8:51 am | |
| Jerry Amundson | Dec 29, 2005 8:55 am | |
| Jerry Amundson | Dec 29, 2005 8:59 am | |
| Jerry Amundson | Dec 29, 2005 9:07 am | |
| Tony Earnshaw | Dec 29, 2005 9:15 am | |
| Tony Earnshaw | Dec 29, 2005 10:09 am | |
| Jerry Amundson | Dec 29, 2005 10:33 am | |
| Binand Sethumadhavan | Dec 29, 2005 11:28 am | |
| Gordon Messmer | Dec 29, 2005 11:32 am | |
| Jonathan Chong | Dec 29, 2005 12:57 pm | |
| Tony Earnshaw | Dec 29, 2005 4:57 pm | |
| Jonathan Chong | Jan 5, 2006 12:50 am | |
| Sam Varshavchik | Jan 5, 2006 3:52 am |
| Permalink for this message Paste this link in email or IM: |
| Permalink for this thread Paste this link in email or IM: |
| Atom feed for this thread Paste this URL into your reader: |
| Subject: | Re: [courier-users] Re: Failed to create cache file: maildirwatch error | Actions... |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Jerry Amundson (jer...@pbs.com) | |
| Date: | Dec 29, 2005 10:33:46 am | |
| List: | net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users | |
On Thu December 29 2005 12:09, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
Jerry Amundson wrote:
[...]
You seem to be willy-nilly throwing solutions at this problem without really understanding either one. Based on ChangeLogs from RedHat and SGI, no major things have changed, and as others have pointed out, the fam including in distro's *does* work.
Hæh? I've continually pointed out, mainly on this list, and shall go on doing so 'til I drop, that the sgi_fam included with RHAS3 and RHAS4 is *utter shit* and does not work (at least, not with any version of Courier IMAP since 3.0.6, at least). And I'm a loyal Red Hat fan, have been for years.
I'm not disputing that. Our server runs with "IMAP_ENHANCEDIDLE=0", mostly due to those very problems. However, crappy fam does not prevent imapd from functioning, but other things would, such as a *misconfigured* fam, or having both i386 and x64 versions of fam packages installed, etc.
I've been running fam-2.6.7-6 on my RH 7.3 server for nearly two years. YMMV...
Why on earth do you think that I'd ever have taken the trouble to reinvent the wheel, if the original *had* worked? Or why so many other Red Hat/Courier aficionados have complained about it not working? *No-one* I've ever seen on this list has ever said that Red Hat's sgi_fam has actually worked for him/her, in fact the opposite.
Really?! Quoting Gordon from yesterday... On Wed December 28 2005 13:50, Gordon Messmer wrote:
Tony Earnshaw wrote:
Red Hat's sgi_fam is utter shit and even when you've got it running, you'll still get the same, literally the same, errors.
That's not true... I've run Courier's IMAP server with several different Red Hat releases, and you won't get any errors when FAM is configured properly.
jerry