Hi all,
and thx to Sam that always finds time to reply to our weird questions:DDD
Alle martedì 22 gennaio 2008, Sam Varshavchik ha scritto:
How does your hypothesis deal with the sql server being down?...
crashing...saving it into the rule file?
the file is inserted into an
exception {}
statement, so if something goes wrong the message will be delivered unfiltered
in the inbox
How does your hypothesis deal with other messages being delivered at the
same time you're installing a new rule file? Whad do they do? What locking
mechanism do you intend to use, in order to guarantee atomic rulefile
updates?
2 hypotesis:
1) the .sql_mailfilter file will be re-created only if the one on the
filesystem is older than 10 minutes
2) the filename is mktemp .sql_mailfilter.XXXX that will be removed after the
delivery of the file
This is one of those things that looks great on paper, but not so great in
practice.
anyway, other ideas/approaches on how to implement per-user-filter
configuration are *really* welcome!
Thanks to all,
R.
"Il seguente messaggio contiene informazioni riservate. Qualora questo
messaggio fosse da Voi ricevuto per errore, Vogliate cortesemente darcene
notizia a mezzo e-mail. Vi sollecitiamo altresì a distruggere il messaggio
erroneamente ricevuto. Quanto precede Vi viene chiesto ai fini del rispetto
della legge in materia di protezione dei dati personali."
6 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-maildropRe: [maildropl] dynamic filtering exa...
