| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Morten Wartou | Jan 3, 2002 5:59 am | |
| Toni Mattila | Jan 3, 2002 6:21 am | |
| Morten Wartou | Jan 3, 2002 6:32 am | |
| Toni Mattila | Jan 3, 2002 6:34 am | |
| Sam Varshavchik | Jan 3, 2002 2:39 pm | |
| Sam Varshavchik | Jan 3, 2002 2:39 pm | |
| Morten Wartou | Jan 3, 2002 3:22 pm | |
| Morten Wartou | Jan 3, 2002 3:23 pm | |
| Sam Varshavchik | Jan 3, 2002 3:30 pm | |
| Sam Varshavchik | Jan 3, 2002 3:31 pm | |
| David | Jan 3, 2002 3:32 pm | |
| Juha Saarinen | Jan 3, 2002 3:37 pm | |
| Morten Wartou | Jan 3, 2002 4:11 pm | |
| Juha Saarinen | Jan 3, 2002 4:15 pm | |
| Joe Croft | Jan 3, 2002 5:20 pm | |
| Michael Carmack | Jan 3, 2002 5:44 pm | |
| Greg Owen | Jan 3, 2002 6:29 pm | |
| Peter C. Norton | Jan 3, 2002 7:13 pm | |
| Michael Carmack | Jan 3, 2002 7:48 pm | |
| Sam Varshavchik | Jan 3, 2002 8:48 pm | |
| Morten Wartou | Jan 4, 2002 12:32 am | |
| Zon Hisham Z.Abidin | Jan 4, 2002 12:57 am | |
| Francois PHILIPPO | Jan 4, 2002 1:27 am | |
| MH - Entwicklung | Jan 4, 2002 3:05 am | |
| Sam Varshavchik | Jan 4, 2002 5:09 am | |
| Sam Varshavchik | Jan 4, 2002 5:10 am | |
| Roger Thomas | Jan 4, 2002 5:58 am | |
| Morten Wartou | Jan 4, 2002 6:13 am | |
| MH - Entwicklung | Jan 4, 2002 9:26 am | |
| Tony Kueh | Jan 4, 2002 11:05 am | |
| Robert L Mathews | Jan 4, 2002 11:09 am | |
| Peter C. Norton | Jan 4, 2002 11:51 am | |
| Sam Varshavchik | Jan 4, 2002 6:20 pm | |
| Sam Varshavchik | Jan 4, 2002 6:21 pm | |
| MH - Entwicklung | Jan 7, 2002 1:13 am |
| Subject: | Re: [courier-users] Re: Suggestion about the RFC Checking of 8-bit-headers | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | MH - Entwicklung (entw...@heubach-edv.de) | |
| Date: | Jan 7, 2002 1:13:50 am | |
| List: | net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users | |
well maybe I should study the relevant RFCs before making suggestions :-) Sorry for that.
Well, one thing I could think of is to build in some extra "intelligence" into
courier.
1. Never accept outgoing mail with bad headers.
2. Accept local mail with bad headers, but add a notification to the e-mail that
it is corrupted. Maybe there could be introduced a switch how to handel local
corrupted mail: 1. attach as plaintext (the existing implementation), 2. attach
a notification to the original mail but keep it a Mime formatted mail (This will
lead into troubles, too, but is not as worse as turning off the checks
completely).
As I mentioned in an earlier mail I tried to build a new Mime message around the
corrupted message. The result was an at-the-first-glance-correct Mime message
saying "corrupted message". The original mail could be read via pop3 but not via
imap. Imap didn't show the message body. My suggestion of using message/rfc822
is indeed just moving the problem from the mta to the delivery agents and
clients - but not solving it.
Regards Manfred
----- Original Message ----- From: "Sam Varshavchik" <mrs...@courier-mta.com> To: <cour...@lists.sourceforge.net> Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 3:21 AM Subject: [courier-users] Re: Suggestion about the RFC Checking of 8-bit-headers
MH - Entwicklung writes:
No can do. A MIME content type of message/rfc822 must be a valid MIME message. And we already know it's not.
Well of course I should have mentioned this. But as the corrupted message is
encapsulated into a well formatted message,
No it's not. It's a part of the original message. Encapsulated message/rfc822 content must also be parsed by IMAP servers, to access the individual sections of the encapsulated MIME message. Essentially, the encapsulated message/rfc822 content is attached into its parent MIME tree. Think of it as multipart content with only one section.
the result is a valid mail message
Nope. If message/rfc822 is corrupted, its parent message is corrupted as well.
-- Sam
_______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list cour...@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users





