atom feed35 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-usersRe: [courier-users] Re: Suggestion ab...
FromSent OnAttachments
Morten WartouJan 3, 2002 5:59 am 
Toni MattilaJan 3, 2002 6:21 am 
Morten WartouJan 3, 2002 6:32 am 
Toni MattilaJan 3, 2002 6:34 am 
Sam VarshavchikJan 3, 2002 2:39 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 3, 2002 2:39 pm 
Morten WartouJan 3, 2002 3:22 pm 
Morten WartouJan 3, 2002 3:23 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 3, 2002 3:30 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 3, 2002 3:31 pm 
DavidJan 3, 2002 3:32 pm 
Juha SaarinenJan 3, 2002 3:37 pm 
Morten WartouJan 3, 2002 4:11 pm 
Juha SaarinenJan 3, 2002 4:15 pm 
Joe CroftJan 3, 2002 5:20 pm 
Michael CarmackJan 3, 2002 5:44 pm 
Greg OwenJan 3, 2002 6:29 pm 
Peter C. NortonJan 3, 2002 7:13 pm 
Michael CarmackJan 3, 2002 7:48 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 3, 2002 8:48 pm 
Morten WartouJan 4, 2002 12:32 am 
Zon Hisham Z.AbidinJan 4, 2002 12:57 am 
Francois PHILIPPOJan 4, 2002 1:27 am 
MH - EntwicklungJan 4, 2002 3:05 am 
Sam VarshavchikJan 4, 2002 5:09 am 
Sam VarshavchikJan 4, 2002 5:10 am 
Roger ThomasJan 4, 2002 5:58 am 
Morten WartouJan 4, 2002 6:13 am 
MH - EntwicklungJan 4, 2002 9:26 am 
Tony KuehJan 4, 2002 11:05 am 
Robert L MathewsJan 4, 2002 11:09 am 
Peter C. NortonJan 4, 2002 11:51 am 
Sam VarshavchikJan 4, 2002 6:20 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 4, 2002 6:21 pm 
MH - EntwicklungJan 7, 2002 1:13 am 
Subject:Re: [courier-users] Re: Suggestion about the RFC Checking of 8-bit-headers
From:MH - Entwicklung (entw@heubach-edv.de)
Date:Jan 7, 2002 1:13:50 am
List:net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users

well maybe I should study the relevant RFCs before making suggestions :-) Sorry for that.

Well, one thing I could think of is to build in some extra "intelligence" into
courier. 1. Never accept outgoing mail with bad headers. 2. Accept local mail with bad headers, but add a notification to the e-mail that
it is corrupted. Maybe there could be introduced a switch how to handel local
corrupted mail: 1. attach as plaintext (the existing implementation), 2. attach
a notification to the original mail but keep it a Mime formatted mail (This will
lead into troubles, too, but is not as worse as turning off the checks
completely).

As I mentioned in an earlier mail I tried to build a new Mime message around the
corrupted message. The result was an at-the-first-glance-correct Mime message
saying "corrupted message". The original mail could be read via pop3 but not via
imap. Imap didn't show the message body. My suggestion of using message/rfc822
is indeed just moving the problem from the mta to the delivery agents and
clients - but not solving it.

Regards Manfred

----- Original Message ----- From: "Sam Varshavchik" <mrs@courier-mta.com> To: <cour@lists.sourceforge.net> Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 3:21 AM Subject: [courier-users] Re: Suggestion about the RFC Checking of 8-bit-headers

MH - Entwicklung writes:

No can do. A MIME content type of message/rfc822 must be a valid MIME message. And we already know it's not.

Well of course I should have mentioned this. But as the corrupted message is
encapsulated into a well formatted message,

No it's not. It's a part of the original message. Encapsulated message/rfc822 content must also be parsed by IMAP servers, to access the individual sections of the encapsulated MIME message. Essentially, the encapsulated message/rfc822 content is attached into its parent MIME tree. Think of it as multipart content with only one section.

the result is a valid mail message

Nope. If message/rfc822 is corrupted, its parent message is corrupted as well.