20 messages in com.perforce.perforce-user[p4] Preserving checkin comments from...
FromSent OnAttachments
Novikoff, Eric05 Aug 2002 11:37 
Novikoff, Eric05 Aug 2002 11:50 
Stephen Vance06 Aug 2002 04:42 
Patrick Bennett06 Aug 2002 07:01 
Chuck Karish06 Aug 2002 09:02 
Patrick Bennett06 Aug 2002 09:09 
Robert Prentice06 Aug 2002 10:13 
Patrick Bennett06 Aug 2002 10:42 
Dave Lewis06 Aug 2002 11:10 
Patrick Bennett06 Aug 2002 11:29 
ste...@vance.com06 Aug 2002 12:04 
Jeffrey Jensen06 Aug 2002 12:32 
Dave Foglesong06 Aug 2002 12:42 
Dave Foglesong06 Aug 2002 12:52 
Patrick Bennett06 Aug 2002 14:30 
ste...@vance.com06 Aug 2002 14:50 
Chuck Karish06 Aug 2002 20:41 
Patrick Bennett06 Aug 2002 20:43 
Chuck Karish06 Aug 2002 21:12 
Chuck Karish06 Aug 2002 21:15 
Subject:[p4] Preserving checkin comments from feature branches.
From:Jeffrey Jensen (JJEN@agribank.com)
Date:08/06/2002 12:32:28 PM
List:com.perforce.perforce-user

I just did a quick test, and -i successfully displayed the original submit comment from the originating branch. Server version: P4D/SOLARIS26/2002.1/34618 (2002/07/03)

C:\devroot-test\src\testdepot\integrate>p4 filelog -i -l p4filelogtest.txt //testdepot/integrate/p4filelogtest.txt ... #2 change 127 edit on 2002/08/06 by jjensen at jjensen-JJENSEN (text)

update file on branch

... #1 change 126 branch on 2002/08/06 by jjensen at jjensen-JJENSEN (text)

integrate file into integrate branch

... ... branch from //testdepot/p4filelogtest.txt#1 //testdepot/p4filelogtest.txt ... #1 change 125 add on 2002/08/06 by jjensen at jjensen-JJENSEN (text)

Original submit comment

... ... branch into //testdepot/integrate/p4filelogtest.txt#1

<steve at vance.com> 08/06/02 02:50PM >>>

Now I'm surprised. What version of the server are you using? I relied on this feature very heavily when it first came out, and it behaved as I described.

Does anyone have any counter-examples and if so, can you supply the server version?

Stephen Vance

Robert Prentice wrote:

Can someone generate an appropriate example, so that we can see where this information shows up, if indeed it does? Thanks! ...Rob Prentice

p4 filelog -l -i bs.txt

//depot/systest/eic/ivy/products/bs.txt .... #9 change 761 integrate on 2002/08/06 by patrickb at PatrickB (text)

Automated Integration from systest/eic/gray to systest/eic/grayint

.... ... copy from //depot/systest/eic/gray/products/bs.txt#15,#20 .... #8 change 759 integrate on 2002/08/06 by patrickb at PatrickB (text)

Automated Integration from systest/eic/main to systest/eic/grayint

.... ... copy from //depot/systest/eic/main/products/bs.txt#5 .... #7 change 753 integrate on 2002/08/05 by PatrickB at PatrickB (text)

Automated Integration from systest/eic/main to systest/eic/grayint

.... ... copy from //depot/systest/eic/main/products/bs.txt#4 ....... etc

Hmm - what's missing here? :> Here's the filelog on the file in /systest/eic/gray

p4 filelog -l bs.txt

//depot/systest/eic/gray/products/bs.txt .... #20 change 760 edit on 2002/08/06 by patrickb at PatrickB (text)

"another test edit"

.... ... copy into //depot/systest/eic/grayint/products/bs.txt#10 .... ... copy into //depot/systest/eic/ivy/products/bs.txt#9 .... ... copy into //depot/systest/eic/yellow/products/bs.txt#7 .... #19 change 757 edit on 2002/08/06 by patrickb at PatrickB (text)

"another test edit"

.... ... copy into //depot/systest/eic/main/products/bs.txt#5

etc. etc.

Notice the change descriptions? "Another test edit" That description (and change) does >NOT< show up in the filelog -i on the integration >to< side. I repeat, the people who think this is the case are mistaken. It only shows the integrated >changelists< - which will contain the integrations only - not the "changelists for the edits that were integrated"

--------------------------------------------- This message was sent using WebMail by ValueWeb. http://www.valueweb.net/webmail