atom feed38 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-usersRe: [courier-users] giving makeuserdb...
FromSent OnAttachments
Ben RosengartJul 5, 2002 4:02 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJul 5, 2002 5:02 pm 
Ben RosengartJul 5, 2002 8:51 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJul 5, 2002 8:59 pm 
Ben RosengartJul 16, 2002 8:19 am 
Sam VarshavchikJul 16, 2002 2:04 pm 
Ben RosengartJul 17, 2002 1:17 pm 
Gordon MessmerJul 17, 2002 1:40 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJul 17, 2002 2:55 pm 
Ben RosengartJul 17, 2002 3:41 pm 
Ben RosengartJul 17, 2002 3:53 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJul 17, 2002 4:11 pm 
Ben RosengartJul 18, 2002 6:35 am 
Ben RosengartJul 18, 2002 9:32 am 
Jesse KeatingJul 18, 2002 9:48 am 
Ben RosengartJul 18, 2002 11:05 am 
Jesse KeatingJul 18, 2002 11:12 am 
Sam VarshavchikJul 18, 2002 11:30 am 
Ben RosengartJul 18, 2002 12:19 pm 
Ben RosengartJul 18, 2002 12:36 pm 
David MillerJul 18, 2002 1:14 pm 
Gordon MessmerJul 18, 2002 1:32 pm 
Juha SaarinenJul 18, 2002 1:39 pm 
Ben RosengartJul 18, 2002 1:49 pm 
Ben RosengartJul 18, 2002 1:52 pm 
Ben RosengartJul 18, 2002 1:54 pm 
Jesse KeatingJul 18, 2002 1:58 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJul 18, 2002 2:03 pm 
Bowie BaileyJul 18, 2002 2:05 pm 
Juha SaarinenJul 18, 2002 2:08 pm 
Ben RosengartJul 18, 2002 2:29 pm 
Ben RosengartJul 18, 2002 2:33 pm 
Ben RosengartJul 18, 2002 2:37 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJul 18, 2002 4:56 pm 
Alessandro VeselyJul 18, 2002 11:00 pm 
Ben RosengartJul 19, 2002 1:27 pm 
Todd LyonsJul 20, 2002 11:29 am 
Ben RosengartJul 22, 2002 7:43 pm 
Subject:Re: [courier-users] giving makeuserdb a little flexibility
From:Ben Rosengart (br+c@panix.com)
Date:Jul 16, 2002 8:19:39 am
List:net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users

On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 11:59:49PM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:

On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 11:51:01PM -0400, Ben Rosengart wrote:

We don't build the userdb on the same host where we use it.

You have a site-specific custom configuration.

The destination directory can currently be set at compile time. I am proposing making this configurable at run-time too. What is the down-side? Who could possibly be harmed by making the software slightly more flexible?

We could use the symlink trick, but what happens when we want to have a couple of different courier-imap installations with different userdbs?

Create different symlinks.

Can you explain exactly how this would work?

Remember: the goal here is to be able to generate distinct userdbs from distinct source files on the same host.

Existing facilities already handle the situation adequately.

How? Unless I misunderstand the directory mechanism, neither of the methods you've suggested is adequate.

Microsoft has argued that open source is bad for business, but you have to ask, "Whose business? Theirs, or yours?" --Tim O'Reilly