|md...@FreeBSD.org||Mar 29, 2011 2:20 pm|
|John Baldwin||Mar 30, 2011 4:59 am|
|Arnaud Lacombe||Mar 30, 2011 8:04 am|
|Dimitry Andric||Mar 30, 2011 8:23 am|
|Nathan Whitehorn||Mar 30, 2011 8:26 am|
|Dimitry Andric||Mar 30, 2011 8:45 am|
|Warner Losh||Mar 30, 2011 10:53 am|
|Robert Watson||Apr 2, 2011 11:29 am|
|Warner Losh||Apr 2, 2011 11:47 am|
|Robert N. M. Watson||Apr 2, 2011 12:09 pm|
|Warner Losh||Apr 2, 2011 3:48 pm|
|Arnaud Lacombe||May 22, 2011 8:47 pm|
|Warner Losh||May 31, 2011 9:23 am|
|Arnaud Lacombe||Jun 6, 2011 2:37 pm|
|Arnaud Lacombe||Jun 25, 2011 11:00 am|
|Arnaud Lacombe||Jul 8, 2011 2:16 pm|
|Arnaud Lacombe||Sep 14, 2011 8:23 pm|
|Garrett Cooper||Nov 16, 2011 10:43 am|
|Subject:||Re: Include file search path|
|From:||Arnaud Lacombe (laco...@gmail.com)|
|Date:||Jul 8, 2011 2:16:22 pm|
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Arnaud Lacombe <laco...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Arnaud Lacombe <laco...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Warner Losh <im...@bsdimp.com> wrote:
On May 22, 2011, at 9:48 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Warner Losh <im...@bsdimp.com> wrote:
On Apr 2, 2011, at 1:10 PM, Robert N. M. Watson wrote:
On 2 Apr 2011, at 19:47, Warner Losh wrote:
(2) Working clang/LLVM cross-compile of FreeBSD. This seems like a basic requirement to adopt clang/LLVM, and as far as I'm aware that's not yet a resolved issue?
0 work has been done here to my knowledge. The world view for clang and our
in-tree gcc differ which makes it a challenge.
That's disappointing. I seem to recall it's more an issue of our build
integration with clang/LLVM than an underlying issue in clang/LLVM?
Yes. The problem isn't hard, the cross compile paradigm is just a little
We (Cambridge) are currently bringing up FreeBSD on a new soft-core 64-bit MIPS
platform. We're already using a non-base gcc for our boot loader work, and plan
to move to using clang/LLVM later in the year. The base system seems a bit
short on detail when it comes to the above, currently.
Yes. I've had to add about a dozen changes so far to get close to building with
xdev compilers. A similar number are needed to make it easy to configure and
add systree support, I think.
Sounds like great progress -- do you think we'll ship 9.0 in a "just works"
state with regard to this?
I sure hope so. I'd like to have demoable stuff by BSDcan.
BSDCan has passed, has there been any advance made since that discussion ?
It is "demonstrable" but not ready to commit to the tree. Needs about 4 hours
of work that I've had trouble scheduling on it due to work getting busier than I
any chances to have a look at the patch or should I wait for the final commit ?
_______________________________________________ free...@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "free...@freebsd.org"