Le Lundi 21 Août 2006 11:41, Keir Fraser a écrit :
On 21/8/06 10:20 am, "Tristan Gingold" <Tris...@bull.net> wrote:
Fine in principle. Specific comments:
* powerpc should be cleaned up at the same time to use the common
infrastructure. I don't want duplicated code hanging around in
arch/powerpc
I have attached a blindly-made patch again powerpc files.
If ppc people could check this, I'd be happy.
* The code you add to common/ should obey the coding style of other
files in that directory
* Arguably we should have an asm-generic for the xencomm guest-access
macros. That's a Linux-ism which I think fits well in this particular
case.
Taken into account in this updated patch.
Looks better. I assume you'll resend with signed-off-by when you want these
applied.
Hi,
here are the signed-off-by patches for xen.
I took the liberty to add Hollis Blanchard in signed-off-by of the first patch
because he is the primary author of these files.
I don't know wether or not these patches should be put off beacause of the
freeze, but they are a no-op for x86.
Tristan.
8 messages in com.xensource.lists.xen-ia64-develRe: [Xen-devel] RFC: xencomm in common
.patch