13 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-questionsRe: Is it worthy upgrading to 9.0 ?| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| sw2wolf | Feb 27, 2012 4:52 pm | |
| Damien Fleuriot | Feb 28, 2012 12:03 am | |
| Erich Dollansky | Feb 28, 2012 2:21 am | |
| Stas Verberkt | Feb 28, 2012 5:14 am | |
| Damien Fleuriot | Feb 28, 2012 5:51 am | |
| Matthew Seaman | Feb 28, 2012 6:02 am | |
| RW | Feb 28, 2012 7:20 am | |
| Patrick Lamaiziere | Feb 28, 2012 11:45 am | |
| Waitman Gobble | Feb 28, 2012 12:07 pm | |
| Allen | Mar 5, 2012 10:01 pm | |
| Damien Fleuriot | Mar 6, 2012 1:49 am | |
| krad | Mar 6, 2012 3:29 am | |
| Damien Fleuriot | Mar 7, 2012 6:11 am |
| Subject: | Re: Is it worthy upgrading to 9.0 ? | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | RW (rwma...@googlemail.com) | |
| Date: | Feb 28, 2012 7:20:07 am | |
| List: | org.freebsd.freebsd-questions | |
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:52:24 +0100 Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 2/28/12 2:14 PM, Stas Verberkt wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 05:21:35PM +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
I cannot tell how often I have said this already. I stay with the even branches until the next even branch comes out. Currently, the machine here runs 8.3 and will stick to 8 until 10.0 or 10.1 will arrive at the scene.
Just wondering: is there any difference between an even and an uneven branch?
Kind regards,
Stas Verberkt
To be honest, there shouldn't be.
There's an old saying that goes along the lines of "uneven are unstable/experimental" but recent comments on the ML have claimed otherwise.
That's a Linux thing surely. I've never seen it claimed for FreeBSD.
_______________________________________________ free...@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "free...@freebsd.org"