| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Josef Karthauser | Feb 4, 2007 2:57 am | |
| Eric Anderson | Feb 6, 2007 4:48 pm | |
| Josef Karthauser | Feb 7, 2007 10:47 am | |
| Jeremie Le Hen | Feb 15, 2007 2:21 pm | |
| Josef Karthauser | Feb 15, 2007 3:22 pm | |
| Kostik Belousov | Feb 15, 2007 3:31 pm | |
| Josef Karthauser | Feb 15, 2007 4:34 pm | |
| Julian Elischer | Feb 15, 2007 6:11 pm | |
| Jeremie Le Hen | Feb 16, 2007 10:30 am | |
| Robert Watson | Feb 16, 2007 12:54 pm | |
| Kostik Belousov | Feb 16, 2007 2:36 pm | |
| Josef Karthauser | Feb 18, 2007 10:41 pm | |
| Robert Watson | Feb 19, 2007 2:01 pm | |
| Robert Watson | Feb 19, 2007 2:08 pm | |
| Robert Watson | Feb 19, 2007 2:28 pm |
| Subject: | nullfs and named pipes. | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Josef Karthauser (jo...@FreeBSD.org) | |
| Date: | Feb 7, 2007 10:47:43 am | |
| List: | org.freebsd.freebsd-hackers | |
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 10:15:46AM -0600, Eric Anderson wrote:
Is this a fundamental design issue with null_fs or a bug?
There appears to be a lot of confusion on the lists about this point as many people are trying to do this so as to make a single mysql server available from within a number of jails, for instance. However people appear to think that this is a limitation of the jail code, not a limitation of the null_fs code. Having named pipes work in null_fs filesystems would be a very handy thing indeed.
I'd appreciate any insights into this.
Just wanted to say that it seems like this should work, and I'm not yet certain why it doesn't. I've looked into it a bit, but my time is very limited, so I doubt I'll be able to put much more into it..
It's been brought to my attention that there's been a PR open about it since April 2003: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/51583. It's got a patch in it, but it's not complete.
I'd really really appreciated it if someone with file system foo could take a look and comment.
Thanks thanks, Joe





