* Mike Smith <msm...@FreeBSD.org> [000710 17:49] wrote:
* Brian Fundakowski Feldman <gre...@FreeBSD.org> [000710 17:17] wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Can you give me a good reason for it? To act like the libc printf() isn't
a good reason, I mean do you think it will actually help anyone in ways
that %d doesn't? Are you noticing tons of submissions of kernel code that
have %i and don't work correctly or something?
I just don't get it :-/
I was annoyed when I used %i and it didn't work. POLA.
Can I have %Z? It should take an integer argument, and print that many
Sure, do you want it as a seperate commit or can I bundle it with the
'i' addition? :)
Basically what I'm getting is that %i isn't portable over to other
In that case I guess it's not needed, I just expected %i to work as
it does in libc. But if you need that %Z hack, I can have a delta
ready for you to review in a couple of minutes.
let me know,
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo...@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message