24 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-archRe: kernel printf %i?| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Alfred Perlstein | Jul 10, 2000 3:05 pm | |
| Brian Fundakowski Feldman | Jul 10, 2000 5:16 pm | |
| Alfred Perlstein | Jul 10, 2000 5:35 pm | |
| Matthew Jacob | Jul 10, 2000 5:50 pm | |
| Mike Smith | Jul 10, 2000 5:57 pm | |
| Alfred Perlstein | Jul 10, 2000 6:15 pm | |
| Greg Lehey | Jul 10, 2000 6:41 pm | |
| Assar Westerlund | Jul 10, 2000 8:04 pm | |
| Sheldon Hearn | Jul 11, 2000 1:20 am | |
| Alfred Perlstein | Jul 11, 2000 1:32 am | |
| Mike Pritchard | Jul 11, 2000 2:13 am | |
| Bruce Evans | Jul 11, 2000 3:03 am | |
| Alfred Perlstein | Jul 11, 2000 3:18 am | |
| Bruce Evans | Jul 11, 2000 9:32 am | |
| Marius Bendiksen | Jul 11, 2000 1:30 pm | |
| Dag-Erling Smorgrav | Jul 12, 2000 12:29 am | |
| Thomas M. Sommers | Jul 12, 2000 2:59 pm | |
| Thomas M. Sommers | Jul 12, 2000 4:08 pm | |
| John-Mark Gurney | Jul 12, 2000 8:53 pm | |
| Alexander Langer | Jul 17, 2000 1:24 am | |
| Alfred Perlstein | Jul 17, 2000 2:40 am | |
| Alexander Langer | Jul 17, 2000 2:43 am | |
| Bruce Evans | Jul 18, 2000 3:29 am | |
| Alexander Langer | Jul 18, 2000 3:32 am |
| Subject: | Re: kernel printf %i? | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Alfred Perlstein (bri...@wintelcom.net) | |
| Date: | Jul 10, 2000 6:15:11 pm | |
| List: | org.freebsd.freebsd-arch | |
* Mike Smith <msm...@FreeBSD.org> [000710 17:49] wrote:
* Brian Fundakowski Feldman <gre...@FreeBSD.org> [000710 17:17] wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
any objections:
Can you give me a good reason for it? To act like the libc printf() isn't a good reason, I mean do you think it will actually help anyone in ways that %d doesn't? Are you noticing tons of submissions of kernel code that have %i and don't work correctly or something?
I just don't get it :-/
I was annoyed when I used %i and it didn't work. POLA.
Can I have %Z? It should take an integer argument, and print that many 'fnord's. Thankyou.
Sure, do you want it as a seperate commit or can I bundle it with the 'i' addition? :)
Basically what I'm getting is that %i isn't portable over to other systems?
In that case I guess it's not needed, I just expected %i to work as it does in libc. But if you need that %Z hack, I can have a delta ready for you to review in a couple of minutes.
let me know, -Alfred
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo...@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message