Hi,
Hi,
I think this doesn't make sense. Why would we make to steps in one? It
would
be the same as a <clicklink href="page1.html:page2.html"/> which would
click
on the link to page1.html and in the resulting page click on the link to
page2.html.
I see this not as two steps in one because it is not comparable with
clicking a link. If you see it from a view perspective you see all
frames if you open the super-page.. Then it's possible to follow all
frames you see when you invoke a page..
if the test fails with:
<followframe name="foo:bar"/>
you get less information as with
<followframe name="foo"/>
<followframe name="bar"/>
where you can immediately see if it is the first or the second frame that is
lacking.
Furthermore in a real test sequence, one will probably not have the 2
followframe just one after the other but something like
<followframe name="foo"/>
<verify....>
<followframe name="bar"/>
with some verifications on the first retrieved frame.
Marc.
12 messages in com.canoo.lists.webtestRe: [Webtest] WebTest CC Build Rel.27...