6 messages in com.mysql.lists.clusterRe: cluster sql note can set to a mas...
FromSent OnAttachments
huang mingyou12 Feb 2006 17:52 
Alex Davies12 Feb 2006 17:55 
huang mingyou12 Feb 2006 18:03 
Stewart Smith12 Feb 2006 22:01 
huang mingyou13 Feb 2006 00:01 
Stewart Smith13 Feb 2006 02:47 
Subject:Re: cluster sql note can set to a master node as a Replication
From:Stewart Smith (stew@mysql.com)
Date:02/13/2006 02:47:17 AM
List:com.mysql.lists.cluster

On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 16:01 +0800, huang mingyou wrote:

Because we database will service for 8 dns servers in 2 different net,so I want use cluster + Replication .the 2 net's connect speed is not very good,so if use cluster I think will not a good idea. but if the cluster can work on it. I think this is my only one choice. is it? hmy

with cluster to cluster replication (5.1), as long as the connection is good enough to run replication of your transactions over (there is a limit on bandwidth of transactions over the replication channel - this is a hardware limitation[1] as well as a software architecture limitation.[2]) you shouldn't have a problem.

I'd encourage you to start playing with 5.1 in a test environment and see how you go. Feedback is greatly appreciated.

[1] you need the bandwidth to pump everything over for one. [2] scaling the software up to do hundreds of thousands of updates per second is a much harder task. It's on our todo list however. The current implementation works great up to certain loads though. For DNS servers, you are unlikely to get anything like this much load.

Jumpstart your cluster: http://www.mysql.com/consulting/packaged/cluster.html