7 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-usersRe: [courier-users] Re: response codes
FromSent OnAttachments
Thomas von HasselFeb 13, 2004 1:53 pm 
Sam VarshavchikFeb 13, 2004 3:32 pm 
Thomas von HasselFeb 14, 2004 1:34 am 
RolandFeb 14, 2004 5:19 am 
Sam VarshavchikFeb 14, 2004 6:25 am 
Thomas von HasselFeb 14, 2004 6:54 am 
Derrick T. WoolworthFeb 14, 2004 5:48 pm 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: [courier-users] Re: response codesActions...
From:Thomas von Hassel (tho@elements.dk)
Date:Feb 14, 2004 1:34:41 am
List:net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users

On 14/2-2004, at 0.30, Sam Varshavchik wrote:

Thomas von Hassel writes:

This is not necesarily a courier question, but since thats what i use .... What reason is there to respond to a "user unknown" with transient error code instead of a permanent failure ? ..like this: : 450 <so@email.com>: User unknown in local recipient table i've seen this a couple of times now and the mail hangs in the queue for 4 days until it's bounced ...

This message comes from the remote mail server, and has nothing to do with Courier.

uhem ..i know that ..my question is why would any mail server connect a transient error code with a "user unknown" type problem ?!

/thomas