atom feed7 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-docsgml entities for CPU architectures?
FromSent OnAttachments
Ben KadukSep 21, 2007 12:13 pm 
Daniel GerzoSep 21, 2007 3:51 pm 
Bruce A. MahSep 22, 2007 9:26 am 
Ben KadukSep 22, 2007 9:46 am 
Bruce A. MahSep 22, 2007 9:51 am 
Ben KadukSep 22, 2007 10:05 am 
Dmitry MorozovskySep 22, 2007 10:05 am 
Subject:sgml entities for CPU architectures?
From:Bruce A. Mah (bm@freebsd.org)
Date:Sep 22, 2007 9:51:54 am
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-doc

If memory serves me right, Ben Kaduk wrote:

On 9/22/07, Bruce A. Mah <bm@freebsd.org> wrote:

If memory serves me right, Daniel Gerzo wrote:

I'm updating my patch to the FAQ (docs/115000) for danger@'s (somewhat) new daily snapshot builds, which are specific to x86 and amd64. Should I just use literals for these architectures, or are the entity-ified somewhere that I haven't found yet?

As far as I know, we do not have entities for architectures.

The release documents grew these entities fairly recently...see src/release/doc/share/sgml/release.ent (on HEAD only at the moment).

But is release.ent pulled into the build of books/faq/book.sgml ?

Ah sorry, I was unclear (no caffeine yet this morning). What I meant to say was that the release documents use this set of entities and that if you want to add entities for doc/ tree documents, using the same names might be good. Apologies for the confusion, I'm off to go make some tea now...

Bruce