17 messages in net.clamav.lists.clamav-win32Re: [clamav-win32] Question regarding...
FromSent OnAttachments
Pandu PoluanJul 10, 2008 10:52 pm 
Nigel HorneJul 11, 2008 1:55 am 
Pandu PoluanJul 11, 2008 3:08 am 
Gianluigi TiesiJul 11, 2008 4:34 am 
SarocetJul 12, 2008 4:06 am 
Nigel HorneJul 17, 2008 12:54 am 
Robert WolfeJul 18, 2008 6:24 am 
Gianluigi TiesiJul 18, 2008 6:52 am 
Pandu PoluanAug 11, 2008 2:56 am 
Nigel HorneAug 11, 2008 3:13 am 
Pandu PoluanAug 11, 2008 3:13 am 
Geoff PartridgeAug 11, 2008 4:50 am 
Reza Mochamad DiannagaraAug 11, 2008 5:22 am 
Brielle BrunsAug 11, 2008 12:58 pm 
Geoff PartridgeAug 11, 2008 12:59 pm 
Pandu PoluanAug 12, 2008 12:49 am 
Brielle BrunsAug 12, 2008 6:59 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: [clamav-win32] Question regarding using libclamavActions...
From:Robert Wolfe (robe@localnet.com)
Date:Jul 18, 2008 6:24:32 am
List:net.clamav.lists.clamav-win32

On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 13:35:16 +0200 Gianluigi Tiesi <sher@netfarm.it> wrote:

| So, to reiterate my question: Must "foo" be GPL-licensed as well?

it must be gpl-compatible, you could make this kind of use with a non gpl
compatible license if libclamav was lgpl

I would think that this would apply only if the program 'foo' were to be
distributed to the world. However, if it is an application for internal use
only, I would think that this does not apply.

"The only good thing about Vista is that even the viruses have compatibility issues. "