atom feed4 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.xacmlRE: [xacml] Chapter 2
FromSent OnAttachments
Polar HumennAug 21, 2002 9:44 am 
Tim MosesAug 21, 2002 9:55 am 
Polar HumennAug 21, 2002 9:58 am 
Anne AndersonAug 21, 2002 12:55 pm 
Subject:RE: [xacml] Chapter 2
From:Anne Anderson (Anne@Sun.com)
Date:Aug 21, 2002 12:55:09 pm
List:org.oasis-open.lists.xacml

I agree. For conformance tests, we need to use a consistent version#. -Anne

On 21 August, Polar Humenn writes: RE: [xacml] Chapter 2

From: Polar Humenn <pol@syr.edu> To: Tim Moses <tim.@entrust.com> Subject: RE: [xacml] Chapter 2 Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 12:57:43 -0400 (EDT)

I think we should be using the version that we are going to publish, which is 1.0. Shall we work toward that?

-Polar

On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Tim Moses wrote:

Polar - Yes it should. There are a number of such inconsistencies. My question: when do we start using "1.0" in our examples, etc.? Should that be in our next version, which will still be marked draft v0.16. All the best. Tim.

----------------------------------------- Tim Moses Tel: 613.270.3183

-----Original Message----- From: Polar Humenn [mailto:pol@syr.edu] Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 12:44 PM To: XACML Subject: [xacml] Chapter 2

Section 2.13 Sc ema Organization and Namespaces has

urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:0.15i:{policy,context, function} ^^^^ Should this coincide with the version of the current document?