18 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-scsiRecommended RAID controller| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Walter Vaughan | Apr 27, 2004 1:28 pm | |
| Scott Long | Apr 27, 2004 3:17 pm | |
| Vinod Kashyap | Apr 27, 2004 3:35 pm | |
| David Rhodus | Apr 27, 2004 5:54 pm | |
| Pete French | Apr 28, 2004 3:19 am | |
| Vinod Kashyap | Apr 28, 2004 10:13 am | |
| Gary Stanley | Apr 28, 2004 10:47 pm | |
| Matthias Andree | Apr 29, 2004 6:13 am | |
| Paul Saab | May 3, 2004 3:50 pm | |
| Chris Dillon | May 4, 2004 4:57 pm | |
| Bob Willcox | Jun 29, 2004 11:31 am | |
| Bob Willcox | Jun 29, 2004 11:34 am | |
| randall ehren | Jun 29, 2004 11:38 am | |
| Bob Willcox | Jun 29, 2004 1:04 pm | |
| randall ehren | Jun 29, 2004 4:55 pm | |
| Bob Willcox | Jun 29, 2004 5:18 pm | |
| Kenneth D. Merry | Jun 29, 2004 5:46 pm | |
| Bob Willcox | Jun 29, 2004 5:51 pm |
| Subject: | Recommended RAID controller | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Chris Dillon (cdil...@wolves.k12.mo.us) | |
| Date: | May 4, 2004 4:57:36 pm | |
| List: | org.freebsd.freebsd-scsi | |
On Mon, 3 May 2004, Paul Saab wrote:
Performance is pretty good and if there's a problem I would be happy to look into it. Management for ciss should be coming in the next few months.
Good to hear the management apps are on their way. I'm in the process of ordering another HP server soon and would like to run FreeBSD on it instead of Win2003 Server, using either the integrated SmartArray 5i Plus or possibly a SmartArray 6402/128 instead. I haven't yet figured out how much disk horsepower serving up 2300 150MB home directories via Samba to 300-500 concurrent users is going to require. :-)
Now if we only had a management utility for mly...
-- Chris Dillon - cdillon(at)wolves.k12.mo.us FreeBSD: The fastest, most open, and most stable OS on the planet - Available for IA32, IA64, AMD64, PC98, Alpha, and UltraSPARC architectures - PowerPC, ARM, MIPS, and S/390 under development - http://www.freebsd.org
Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is putting a reply at the top of the message frowned upon?