20 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.wsbpelRE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Let's get a...| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Danny van der Rijn | Sep 3, 2003 10:53 am | |
| Satish Thatte | Sep 3, 2003 7:05 pm | |
| Chris Keller | Sep 4, 2003 6:49 am | |
| Danny van der Rijn | Sep 4, 2003 9:29 am | |
| Danny van der Rijn | Sep 4, 2003 9:35 am | |
| Satish Thatte | Sep 4, 2003 9:59 am | |
| David RR Webber - XML ebusiness | Sep 4, 2003 8:50 pm | |
| Chris Keller | Sep 5, 2003 5:26 am | |
| Chris Keller | Sep 5, 2003 5:48 am | |
| Monica Martin | Sep 5, 2003 6:27 am | |
| Chris Keller | Sep 5, 2003 6:32 am | |
| Monica Martin | Sep 5, 2003 6:40 am | |
| Chris Keller | Sep 5, 2003 6:41 am | |
| Danny van der Rijn | Sep 5, 2003 10:33 am | |
| David RR Webber - XML ebusiness | Sep 5, 2003 11:54 am | |
| David RR Webber - XML ebusiness | Sep 5, 2003 11:59 am | |
| David RR Webber - XML ebusiness | Sep 5, 2003 12:03 pm | |
| Ugo Corda | Sep 5, 2003 2:38 pm | |
| Danny van der Rijn | Sep 5, 2003 3:55 pm | |
| Francisco Curbera | Sep 11, 2003 6:07 pm |
| Subject: | RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Let's get a proposal nailed down | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Chris Keller (chri...@active-endpoints.com) | |
| Date: | Sep 5, 2003 6:41:48 am | |
| List: | org.oasis-open.lists.wsbpel | |
Sounds good is the template posted in the documents section for the group?
-----Original Message----- From: Monica Martin [mailto:moni...@sun.com] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 10:07 AM To: chri...@active-endpoints.com Cc: 'Danny van der Rijn'; wsb...@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Let's get a proposal nailed down
Chris Keller wrote:
+1
-----Original Message----- From: Monica Martin [mailto:moni...@sun.com] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 9:54 AM To: chri...@active-endpoints.com Cc: 'Danny van der Rijn'; wsb...@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 11 - Let's get a proposal nailed down
Chris Keller wrote:
Danny,
The way the current copy/to functionality reads is as a content replacement not a node copy. Although it is not clear the treatment of attributes and child nodes for query (since there are no examples), but based on the requirement that the types be compatible it would appear
to
be a complete content copy (attributes and child nodes).
mm1: As we have seen with issue 52, perhaps we need a few examples or even use cases to solidify what the requirements are here - content replacement or node copy.
mm2: Chris, we have a template so if you and Danny can solidify your thoughts, I would be willing to assist as needed to get the use case formalized. (Within my limit of understanding of some of the syntactic nuances you both have been discussing). Let's think of a relevant scenario first. Thanks.