18 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-hackersRe: Include file search path| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| md...@FreeBSD.org | Mar 29, 2011 2:20 pm | |
| John Baldwin | Mar 30, 2011 4:59 am | |
| Arnaud Lacombe | Mar 30, 2011 8:04 am | |
| Dimitry Andric | Mar 30, 2011 8:23 am | |
| Nathan Whitehorn | Mar 30, 2011 8:26 am | |
| Dimitry Andric | Mar 30, 2011 8:45 am | |
| Warner Losh | Mar 30, 2011 10:53 am | |
| Robert Watson | Apr 2, 2011 11:29 am | |
| Warner Losh | Apr 2, 2011 11:47 am | |
| Robert N. M. Watson | Apr 2, 2011 12:09 pm | |
| Warner Losh | Apr 2, 2011 3:48 pm | |
| Arnaud Lacombe | May 22, 2011 8:47 pm | |
| Warner Losh | May 31, 2011 9:23 am | |
| Arnaud Lacombe | Jun 6, 2011 2:37 pm | |
| Arnaud Lacombe | Jun 25, 2011 11:00 am | |
| Arnaud Lacombe | Jul 8, 2011 2:16 pm | |
| Arnaud Lacombe | Sep 14, 2011 8:23 pm | |
| Garrett Cooper | Nov 16, 2011 10:43 am |
| Subject: | Re: Include file search path | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Arnaud Lacombe (laco...@gmail.com) | |
| Date: | May 22, 2011 8:47:44 pm | |
| List: | org.freebsd.freebsd-hackers | |
Hi Warner,
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Warner Losh <im...@bsdimp.com> wrote:
On Apr 2, 2011, at 1:10 PM, Robert N. M. Watson wrote:
On 2 Apr 2011, at 19:47, Warner Losh wrote:
(2) Working clang/LLVM cross-compile of FreeBSD. This seems like a basic requirement to adopt clang/LLVM, and as far as I'm aware that's not yet a resolved issue?
0 work has been done here to my knowledge. The world view for clang and our
in-tree gcc differ which makes it a challenge.
That's disappointing. I seem to recall it's more an issue of our build
integration with clang/LLVM than an underlying issue in clang/LLVM?
Yes. The problem isn't hard, the cross compile paradigm is just a little
different.
We (Cambridge) are currently bringing up FreeBSD on a new soft-core 64-bit MIPS
platform. We're already using a non-base gcc for our boot loader work, and plan
to move to using clang/LLVM later in the year. The base system seems a bit
short on detail when it comes to the above, currently.
Yes. I've had to add about a dozen changes so far to get close to building with
xdev compilers. A similar number are needed to make it easy to configure and
add systree support, I think.
Sounds like great progress -- do you think we'll ship 9.0 in a "just works"
state with regard to this?
I sure hope so. I'd like to have demoable stuff by BSDcan.
BSDCan has passed, has there been any advance made since that discussion ?
Thanks, - Arnaud
_______________________________________________ free...@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "free...@freebsd.org"