atom feed22 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-hardwareRe: O/S Support for large [512Mb] PC ...
FromSent OnAttachments
Mr G.D. TysonJun 19, 1998 3:15 am 
Brian BairdJun 19, 1998 4:40 am 
see...@plethora.netJun 19, 1998 5:04 am 
Paul GoyetteJun 19, 1998 5:13 am 
see...@plethora.netJun 19, 1998 5:20 am 
Marc van KempenJun 19, 1998 8:04 am 
Manuel BouyerJun 19, 1998 10:10 am 
Jan B. KoumJun 20, 1998 6:58 pm 
Matthew JacobJun 20, 1998 7:56 pm.Other, .Other, .Other
Matthew JacobJun 20, 1998 8:42 pm 
Mike SmithJun 21, 1998 1:06 pm 
Mike SmithJun 21, 1998 1:36 pm 
Mike SmithJun 21, 1998 2:24 pm 
see...@plethora.netJun 21, 1998 3:03 pm 
Justin T. GibbsJun 21, 1998 3:06 pm 
Open Systems NetworkingJun 21, 1998 3:43 pm 
Mike SmithJun 21, 1998 9:32 pm 
Castor FuJun 21, 1998 10:50 pm 
Kenneth D. MerryJun 21, 1998 11:26 pm 
Gary PalmerJun 22, 1998 12:47 am 
Justin T. GibbsJun 22, 1998 6:15 am 
Sean WithamJun 22, 1998 6:19 am 
Subject:Re: O/S Support for large [512Mb] PC systems
From:Brian Baird (br@brig.com)
Date:Jun 19, 1998 4:40:50 am
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-hardware

1) Ideally I would like the 9Gb disks to have a single large filesystem + some swap. However I think the max size of a filesystem is limited to 2Gb - Is this still true ?

I've built large file servers using NetBSD for some years now. NetBSD has no problems with 9GB file systems (other than running fsck on them can take some time). You could even run ccd on a number of these drives to get a really massive filesystem. I have a NetBSD 1.2 based system with two Adaptec 2940 PCI controllers and 13 9GB Seagate Elite disks (and a 48GB DAT changer). It's been solid as a rock for several years.

2) Will 512Mb of memory break anything ? (I know I will have to tell the kernel the true memory size)

Recent (1.3 or later) versions of NetBSD correctly autodetect how much memory is in your machine. In earlier versions you had to config a special kernel to tell it if you had more than 64MB of memory. I've had lots of NetBSD machines with 256MB of memory. I've never gone to 512MB because I've never needed to for the applications I was running. You'll probably want to config a kernel that tunes NMBCLUSTERS to 2048 (for a busy network server) and NBUF and BUFPAGES so that they use more than 10% of memory.

3) Has anyone any experience of a machine with this sort of configuration ?

See above :-)

4) Has anyone used any of the Supermicro boards e.g. P6DBS with the builtin Adaptec Dual Channel UWSCSI ? or got suggestions for other suitable motherboards (preferably ones with will take up to 1Gb RAM) I should point out that 'the management' would REALLY like to use a commercially available box rather than me build one out of bits !

I've always stuck with Asus or Tyan motherboards with PCI card SCSI controllers. I think some of the earlier on-board SCSI controllers were less capable than the PCI cards (due to fewer SCBs? my memory is kind of fuzzy about this).

I have little experience with FreeBSD, but I'm sure it's capable as well. Just read ftp://ftp.cdrom.com/archive-info/wcarchive.txt for a description of a monster machine.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message