atom feed21 messages in ru.sysoev.nginxRe: nginx-lua and nginx upload module
FromSent OnAttachments
strawmanNov 25, 2011 11:35 pm 
agentzhNov 26, 2011 12:07 am 
Nginx UserNov 26, 2011 1:16 am.lua
agentzhNov 26, 2011 1:45 am 
Nginx UserNov 26, 2011 2:06 am 
Nginx UserNov 26, 2011 2:16 am.lua
strawmanNov 26, 2011 5:10 am 
agentzhNov 26, 2011 5:15 am 
Nginx UserNov 26, 2011 5:24 am 
Valery KholodkovNov 26, 2011 12:13 pm 
Nginx UserNov 26, 2011 1:16 pm 
agentzhNov 26, 2011 2:08 pm 
Nginx UserNov 27, 2011 6:01 am 
Valery KholodkovNov 28, 2011 1:45 am 
agentzhNov 28, 2011 1:51 am 
Valery KholodkovNov 28, 2011 2:21 am 
agentzhNov 28, 2011 10:00 pm 
Valery KholodkovNov 29, 2011 2:29 am 
agentzhNov 29, 2011 2:49 am 
Andrew AlexeevNov 29, 2011 6:58 am 
Valery KholodkovNov 29, 2011 7:50 am 
Subject:Re: nginx-lua and nginx upload module
From:Nginx User (ngi@nginxuser.net)
Date:Nov 26, 2011 5:24:18 am
List:ru.sysoev.nginx

On 26 November 2011 16:16, agentzh <agen@gmail.com> wrote:

Sigh. I really hope that ngx_upload could be implemented as a rewrite or access phase handler rather than a content handler, then we can trivially combine with content_by_lua in the same location, for example, and no longer need to do any kind of internal redirections that clear everything including nginx variables and module contexts.

For your info, I believe agentzh may be refering, obliquely, to the restriction in the last line here: http://wiki.nginx.org/HttpLuaModule#content_by_lua (which also applies to content_by_lua_file).