86 messages constrained by query "list:org.oasis-open list:org.xml list:org.ebxml"

org.oasis-open.lists.sca-bindings [All Lists]

2009 September [All Months]

[sca-bindings] BINDINGS-97: Draft of suggested response - Anish Karmarkar
[sca-bindings] raw chat log 3 Sept 2009 - Martin Chapman
[sca-bindings] Groups - SCA Bindings minutes 2009-09-03 (SCA Bindings minutes 2009-09-03.doc) uploaded - simo...@uk.ibm.com
[sca-bindings] Groups - SCA Bindings minutes 2009-08-27 (SCA Bindings minutes 2009-08-27.doc) modified - simo...@uk.ibm.com
[sca-bindings] Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon modified - simo...@uk.ibm.com
[sca-bindings] Groups - SCA JCA Test Assertions working draft (sca-jcabinding-1.1-test-assertions-wd02.doc) uploaded - bo...@us.ibm.com
[sca-bindings] Groups - SCA JCA Test Assertions working draft (pdf) (sca-jcabinding-1.1-test-assertions-wd02.pdf) uploaded - bo...@us.ibm.com
[sca-bindings] JCA TA Document proposal - wd02 - David Booz
[sca-bindings] Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon modified - simo...@uk.ibm.com
[sca-bindings] Groups - JCA Test Assertions WD03 (sca-jcabinding-1.1-test-assertions-wd03.doc) uploaded - aupp...@us.ibm.com
[sca-bindings] Groups - JCA Test Assertions WD03 (PDF) (sca-jcabinding-1.1-test-assertions-wd03.pdf) uploaded - aupp...@us.ibm.com
Re: [sca-bindings] JCA TA Document proposal - wd02 - Bryan Aupperle
[sca-bindings] NEW ISSUE: JCA Missing Normative statements re: connection/@name and activationSpec/@name - Bryan Aupperle
[sca-bindings] NEW ISSUE: BJC20008 and BJC20014 are unclear - Bryan Aupperle
Re: [sca-bindings] ISSUE-88: JCA Missing Normative statements re: connection/@name and activationSpec/@name - Eric Johnson
Re: [sca-bindings] ISSUE-89: BJC20008 and BJC20014 are unclear - Eric Johnson
[sca-bindings] Groups - sca-wsbinding-1.1-test-assertions-wd01.odt uploaded - Anis...@oracle.com
[sca-bindings] Groups - sca-wsbinding-1.1-test-assertions-wd01.pdf uploaded - Anis...@oracle.com
[sca-bindings] Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon modified - simo...@uk.ibm.com
[sca-bindings] Further thoughts on issue BINDINGS-85 - Simon Holdsworth
Re: [sca-bindings] Further thoughts on issue BINDINGS-85 - ashok malhotra
[sca-bindings] raw minutes - 10 Sept 2009 - David Booz
[sca-bindings] Groups - SCA Bindings minutes 2009-09-10 (SCA Bindings minutes 2009-09-10.doc) uploaded - simo...@uk.ibm.com
[sca-bindings] Groups - SCA Bindings minutes 2009-09-03 (SCA Bindings minutes 2009-09-03.doc) modified - simo...@uk.ibm.com
[sca-bindings] Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon added - simo...@uk.ibm.com
[sca-bindings] Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon modified - simo...@uk.ibm.com
Re: [sca-bindings] Further thoughts on issue BINDINGS-85 - ashok malhotra
Re: [sca-bindings] Further thoughts on issue BINDINGS-85 - David Booz
Re: [sca-bindings] Further thoughts on issue BINDINGS-85 - Eric Johnson
Re: [sca-bindings] Further thoughts on issue BINDINGS-85 - Simon Holdsworth
Re: [sca-bindings] Further thoughts on issue BINDINGS-85 - ashok malhotra
Re: [sca-bindings] Further thoughts on issue BINDINGS-85 - Simon Holdsworth
[sca-bindings] NEW ISSUE: no defaults for JMS headers - Simon Holdsworth
Re: [sca-bindings] Proposed resolution to BINDINGS-85 - Simon Holdsworth
Re: [sca-bindings] Further thoughts on issue BINDINGS-85 - Eric Johnson
Re: [sca-bindings] Proposed resolution to BINDINGS-85 - Eric Johnson
Re: [sca-bindings] Further thoughts on issue BINDINGS-85 - David Booz
Re: [sca-bindings] ISSUE-90: no defaults for JMS headers - Eric Johnson
Re: [sca-bindings] Proposed resolution to BINDINGS-85 - Eric Johnson
Re: [sca-bindings] Proposed resolution to BINDINGS-85 - Eric Johnson
Re: [sca-bindings] Proposed resolution to BINDINGS-85 - David Booz
Re: [sca-bindings] Proposed resolution to BINDINGS-85 - David Booz
Re: [sca-bindings] Further thoughts on issue BINDINGS-85 - Anish Karmarkar
Re: [sca-bindings] Proposed resolution to BINDINGS-85 - Anish Karmarkar
[sca-bindings] BWS20004 incorrectly talks about 'available ports for the reference' rather than '... reference binding'. - Anish Karmarkar
[sca-bindings] [NEW ISSUE] BWS20004 incorrectly talks about 'available ports for the reference' rather than '... reference binding'. - Anish Karmarkar
[sca-bindings] [NEW ISSUE] BWS20010 and BWS20014 need to be specific to the reference binding - Anish Karmarkar
[sca-bindings] Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon modified - simo...@uk.ibm.com
Re: [sca-bindings] ISSUE-91: BWS20004 incorrectly talks about 'available ports for the reference' rather than '... reference binding'. - Eric Johnson
Re: [sca-bindings] ISSUE-92: BWS20010 and BWS20014 need to be specific to the reference binding - Eric Johnson
[sca-bindings] LOA - ashok malhotra
Re: [sca-bindings] Proposed resolution to BINDINGS-85 - Mike Edwards
[sca-bindings] LOA - Martin Chapman
[sca-bindings] Groups - SCA Bindings minutes 2009-09-17 (SCA Bindings minutes 2009-09-17.doc) uploaded - simo...@uk.ibm.com
[sca-bindings] Groups - SCA Bindings minutes 2009-09-10 (SCA Bindings minutes 2009-09-10.doc) modified - simo...@uk.ibm.com
[sca-bindings] Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon modified - simo...@uk.ibm.com
[sca-bindings] Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon modified - simo...@uk.ibm.com
[sca-bindings] NEW ISSUE: BJM60006 too vague and conflicts with other statements - Simon Holdsworth
[sca-bindings] NEW ISSUE: scaCallbackDestination destination name unclear - Simon Holdsworth
[sca-bindings] NEW ISSUE: BJM30032 and BJM30035 conflict - Simon Holdsworth
[sca-bindings] NEW ISSUE: BJM60012 and BJM60013 conflict - Simon Holdsworth
[sca-bindings] Groups - sca-jmsbinding-1.1-test-assertions-wd02.doc uploaded - simo...@uk.ibm.com
[sca-bindings] Groups - sca-jmsbinding-1.1-test-assertions-wd02.pdf uploaded - simo...@uk.ibm.com
Re: [sca-bindings] ISSUE-93: BJM60006 too vague and conflicts with other statements - Eric Johnson
Re: [sca-bindings] ISSUE-94: scaCallbackDestination destination name unclear - Eric Johnson
[sca-bindings] Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon modified - simo...@uk.ibm.com
Re: [sca-bindings] ISSUE-95: BJM30032 and BJM30035 conflict - Eric Johnson
Re: [sca-bindings] ISSUE-96: BJM60012 and BJM60013 conflict - Eric Johnson
[sca-bindings] Groups - SCA Bindings minutes 2009-09-24 (SCA Bindings minutes 2009-09-24.doc) uploaded - simo...@uk.ibm.com
[sca-bindings] Groups - SCA Bindings minutes 2009-09-17 (SCA Bindings minutes 2009-09-17.doc) modified - simo...@uk.ibm.com
[sca-bindings] Chat log for 24 Sep. - Bryan Aupperle
[sca-bindings] Updated proposal for issue BINDINGS-85 - Simon Holdsworth
[sca-bindings] Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon modified - simo...@uk.ibm.com
[sca-bindings] Thanks and goodbye! - Simon Nash
[sca-bindings] Re: [sca-assembly] Thanks and goodbye! - ashok malhotra
[sca-bindings] Re: [sca-assembly] Thanks and goodbye! - David Booz
Re: [sca-bindings] Thanks and goodbye! - Simon Holdsworth
[sca-bindings] Re: [sca-assembly] Thanks and goodbye! - Bryan Aupperle
[sca-bindings] Re: [sca-bindings-comment] ISSUE-97, confusing statement on correlation ID in the context of callbacks with JMS binding - Eric Johnson
[sca-bindings] RE: [sca-j] Thanks and goodbye! - Patil, Sanjay
[sca-bindings] Groups - SCA Bindings Telecon modified - simo...@uk.ibm.com
[sca-bindings] BINDINGS-90 no defaults for JMS headers - Simon Holdsworth
[sca-bindings] BINDINGS-93 - alternate proposal.... - Eric Johnson
[sca-bindings] NEW ISSUE: incorrect capitalization of sca;messageID correlation scheme - Eric Johnson
Re: [sca-bindings] BINDINGS-93 - alternate proposal.... - Simon Holdsworth
Re: [sca-bindings] BINDINGS-98: incorrect capitalization of sca;messageID correlation scheme - Eric Johnson