16 messages

org.codehaus.groovy.jsr [All Lists]

2007 January [All Months]

Re: [groovy-user] Groovy 1.0 is there! - Martin C. Martin
Re: [groovy-jsr] Groovy 1.0 is there! - Mansour Raad
Groovy 1.0 is there! - Guillaume Laforge
Re: [groovy-user] Groovy 1.0 is there! - Jeremy Rayner
add identity syntax 'foo === bar' which is same as 'foo.is(bar)' - Daniel.Sun
Re: [groovy-jsr] add identity syntax 'foo === bar' which is same as 'foo.is(bar)' - Jochen Theodorou
Re: [groovy-jsr] add identity syntax 'foo === bar' which is same as 'foo.is(bar)' - Daniel.Sun
List of Closures and traditional for lopp - Jochen Theodorou
Re: [groovy-jsr] List of Closures and traditional for lopp - Martin C. Martin
If the default implementation of plus() is "toString() + s", groovy will be more harmony with Java. - Daniel.Sun
Re: [groovy-jsr] If the default implementation of plus() is "toString() + s", groovy will be more harmony with Java. - Martin C. Martin
Re: [groovy-jsr] If the default implementation of plus() is "toString() + s", groovy will be more harmony with Java. - John Wilson
Re: [groovy-jsr] If the default implementation of plus() is "toString() + s", groovy will be more harmony with Java. - Daniel.Sun
Re: [groovy-jsr] If the default implementation of plus() is "toString() + s", groovy will be more harmony with Java. - Graeme Rocher
Re: [groovy-jsr] If the default implementation of plus() is "toString() + s", groovy will be more harmony with Java. - John Wilson
Re: [groovy-jsr] If the default implementation of plus() is "toString() + s", groovy will be more harmony with Java. - John Wilson